Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Mar 6, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 11, 2026 - May 6, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Clinical Model Autophagy: The Risk of Interpretative Drift in Recursive Medical AI
ABSTRACT
The rapid integration of large language models (LLMs) into electronic medical record (EMR) systems introduces a critical theoretical vulnerability. Drawing on foundational computer science proofs of "model collapse," this viewpoint introduces the concept of "Clinical Model Autophagy"—a systemic degradation of diagnostic integrity that occurs when clinical AI models are recursively trained on unverified, AI-generated synthetic data. As these recursive models may progressively regress toward statistical means, they undergo "Interpretative Drift," a clinically concerning phenomenon where rare pathological variances are systematically erased and complex diseases are homogenized into benign averages. To prevent the irreversible contamination of healthcare data ecosystems, the author urgently proposes the Data Purity Standard (DPS). The DPS mandates the cryptographic watermarking of all AI-assisted clinical entries for provenance tracking, alongside the establishment of "Human Vaults." These physically segregated repositories of physician-verified heritage data will serve as immutable biological anchors to safely guide future AI training, ensuring the long-term reliability of digital health infrastructure.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.