Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Nov 23, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 23, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
Date Accepted: Dec 12, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Complementing a Clinical Trial With Human-Computer Interaction: Patients’ User Experience With Telehealth

Jalil S, Myers T, Atkinson I, Soden M

Complementing a Clinical Trial With Human-Computer Interaction: Patients’ User Experience With Telehealth

JMIR Hum Factors 2019;6(2):e9481

DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.9481

PMID: 31172958

PMCID: 6592491

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Complementing a Clinical Trial With Human-Computer Interaction: Patients’ User Experience With Telehealth

  • Sakib Jalil; 
  • Trina Myers; 
  • Ian Atkinson; 
  • Muriel Soden

Background:

The use of telehealth to monitor patients from home is on the rise. Telehealth technology is evaluated in a clinical trial with measures of health outcomes and cost-effectiveness. However, what happens between a technology and the patients is not investigated during a clinical trial—the telehealth technology remains as a “black box.” Meanwhile, three decades of research in the discipline of human-computer interaction (HCI) presents design, implementation, and evaluation of technologies with a primary emphasis on users. HCI research has exposed the importance of user experience (UX) as an essential part of technology development and evaluation.

Objective:

This research investigates the UX of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) with a telehealth in-home monitoring device to manage T2D from home. We investigate how the UX during a clinical trial can be researched and what a clinical trial can learn from HCI research.

Methods:

We adopted an ethnographic philosophy and conducted a contextual inquiry due to time limitations followed by semistructured interviews of 9 T2D patients. We defined the method as Clinical User-experience Evaluation (CUE). The patients were enrolled in a telehealth clinical trial of T2D; however, this research was an independent study conducted by information technologists and health researchers for a user-centered evaluation of telehealth.

Results:

Key analytical findings were that patients valued the benefits of in-home monitoring, but the current device did not possess all functionalities that patients wanted. The results include patients’ experiences and emotions while using the device, patients’ perceived benefits of the device, and how patients domesticated the device. Further analysis showed the influence of the device on patients’ awareness, family involvement, and design implications for telehealth for T2D.

Conclusions:

HCI could complement telehealth clinical trials and uncover knowledge about T2D patients’ UX and future design implications. Through HCI we can look into the “black box” phenomenon of clinical trials and create patient-centered telehealth solutions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jalil S, Myers T, Atkinson I, Soden M

Complementing a Clinical Trial With Human-Computer Interaction: Patients’ User Experience With Telehealth

JMIR Hum Factors 2019;6(2):e9481

DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.9481

PMID: 31172958

PMCID: 6592491

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.