Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Mar 1, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 6, 2026 - May 1, 2026
Date Accepted: May 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Explainable AI for Equitable Nurse Scheduling: Pragmatic Pre-Post Implementation Study

Shia BC, Peng SM, Chang CY, Lo CY, WANG SR

Explainable AI for Equitable Nurse Scheduling: Pragmatic Pre-Post Implementation Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e94450

DOI: 10.2196/94450

PMID: 42391503

Explainable AI for Equitable Nurse Scheduling: A Pragmatic Pre-Post Implementation Study

  • Ben-Chang Shia; 
  • Szu-Ming Peng; 
  • Chiu-Yang Chang; 
  • Chiung-Yun Lo; 
  • SHENG-RU WANG

ABSTRACT

Background:

Inequitable and time-consuming shift scheduling contributes to nurse burnout, dissatisfaction, and turnover. In Taiwan, annual nurse turnover exceeds 11%, and rigid 3-shift systems combined with perceived unfairness in workload distribution are frequently cited concerns. Although AI scheduling tools exist, most lack transparency and do not adequately address nurses’ concerns about fairness and trust, limiting their adoption in practice.

Objective:

This study aimed to develop and evaluate a transparent, nurse-centered scheduling decision support system designed to reduce administrative burden, improve workload equity, and enhance staff acceptance in routine clinical settings.

Methods:

We conducted a pragmatic before-and-after implementation study at a 677-bed teaching hospital in Taiwan, involving 8 nursing departments and 156 nurses. A 6-month manual scheduling period was compared with a 6-month period using the new AI scheduling system. The system supported nurse managers by providing predictive workload insights, transparent explanations for scheduling decisions, and real-time equity monitoring. Outcomes included scheduling time, scheduling errors, workload variation, preference satisfaction, and user acceptance. Statistical analyses included linear mixed-effects and generalized estimating models.

Results:

Implementation reduced monthly scheduling time by 81.2% (32.0±8.0 to 6.0±2.0 hours; p<.001) and decreased scheduling errors by 73.8% (18.3% to 4.8%; p<.001). Nurse satisfaction increased significantly (3.2±0.8 to 4.4±0.6; p<.001), and routine adoption reached 94% by Month 3. Workload distribution became substantially more equitable, with reduced variation in shift allocation and elimination of experience-related disparities. Preference satisfaction was evenly distributed across staff levels. Greater engagement with schedule explanations was associated with higher satisfaction (r=0.456; p<.001).

Conclusions:

A transparent and fairness-oriented scheduling system can meaningfully reduce managerial workload, enhance perceived equity, and improve nurse acceptance in real-world practice. These findings suggest that explainable AI tools may support nurse well-being and promote more sustainable workforce management in hospital settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shia BC, Peng SM, Chang CY, Lo CY, WANG SR

Explainable AI for Equitable Nurse Scheduling: Pragmatic Pre-Post Implementation Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e94450

DOI: 10.2196/94450

PMID: 42391503

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.