Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Feb 27, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Accessing the feasibility of ambient scribe technology in stimulated physiotherapy outpatient consultation: a pilot study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Extensive documentation requirements, time constraints and an increasing burden of an aging population place increasing demands on the healthcare sector. Ambient scribe technology offers a potential time-optimizing solution by transcribing spoken conversations into draft clinical notes in real-time.
Objective:
To assess the clinical utility of an ambient scribe tool in an outpatient physiotherapy department, with a focus on timesaving, documentation quality and employee satisfaction.
Methods:
Outpatient consultations were simulated to compare the ambient scribe tool against regular documentation practices. A head-to-head comparison was used for time difference. Quality was evaluated by the modified Physician Documentation Quality Index 9. Employee satisfaction was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model.
Results:
Across 13 cases, documentation time was reduced by an average of 35%. The documentation quality was rated 31.15 out of 35 points. Physiotherapists acknowledge ambient scribes potential usefulness.
Conclusions:
Ambient scribe significantly reduced documentation time and attained good documentation quality. However, there are some inconsistencies in employee satisfaction
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.