Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Feb 25, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 17, 2026 - May 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Data-driven C-section risk modeling with geographic insights: a U.S. population-based machine learning analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Cesarean section (C-section) is the most common surgical procedure in the United States, yet its use varies widely across regions and institutions. While clinical risk factors are important, growing evidence suggests that delivery decisions are also shaped by geographic context and health system characteristics. Understanding these systemic drivers is critical for improving obstetric equity and aligning C-section use with clinical need.
Objective:
To examine the extent of geographic and institutional variation in C-section use across the United States and to evaluate the performance and implications of machine learning–based risk prediction across clinically defined risk groups.
Methods:
This population-based study analyzed 38·1 million U.S. births from the 2013–2022 National Vital Statistics System Natality Detailed Files. Interpretable logistic regression models with county fixed effects and supervised machine learning approaches were used to examine factors associated with C-section delivery and to predict C-section risk in the full population and in low-risk and high-risk subgroups. County-level health system capacity and socioeconomic characteristics were linked from national administrative sources. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with probability thresholds optimized to balance overall performance and clinical relevance.
Results:
C-section rates exhibited substantial and persistent geographic variation, with consistently higher utilization in the U.S. South despite a modest national decline over time. After adjustment for detailed maternal risk factors, county fixed effects explained a large share of residual variation. Machine learning models demonstrated good predictive performance (AUC 0·81–0·83), but performance varied markedly across risk groups, with substantially lower accuracy in low-risk pregnancies. Threshold optimization revealed clinically meaningful trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions:
C-section use in the United States is strongly influenced by geographic and institutional context in addition to maternal risk. Policies narrowly focused on low-risk populations may fail to address—and may inadvertently exacerbate—system-level drivers of variation. Risk-adjusted, context-aware prediction tools may support more equitable and clinically appropriate obstetric decision-making.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.