JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

The medical black bag is synonymous with physicians, especially general practitioners who are expected to be ready to provide care across settings. The content of the devices they use will likely expand due to the proliferation of digital tools. As portable diagnostics diversify, guidance is increasingly needed on which tools clinicians should choose and what this shift may mean for the physical examination and point-of-care assessment.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to map the current, the possible, and the future content of the medical black bag using anticipatory methods, and to provide a general, practice-oriented outline of how portable diagnostic technologies may evolve in primary care.

Methods:

National equipment lists and the World Health Organization’s MeDevIS database were compiled and filtered to define a contemporary reference set of reusable portable diagnostic instruments relevant to generalist practice. A one-year trend analysis using major professional and medical technology news sources were conducted to identify possible additions, screening for devices with diagnostic relevance, portability, digital capability, market presence, and evidence visibility. To extend the outlook to 2035, we performed a horizon scanning exercise using the same review period. These devices got grouped into thematic categories.

Results:

National equipment recommendations and World Health Organization lists yielded a stable core set of diagnostic tools used in routine primary care practice. Trend analysis and horizon scanning expanded this set by identifying possible and future additions of portable medical devices that can be used at the point of care. Overall, the identified technologies were increasingly digital, diverse, connected, and in some cases, AI supported, reflecting a trajectory toward more integrated and data-enabled diagnostics.

Conclusions:

The medical black bag is likely to evolve from a stable set of familiar instruments toward a broader toolbox of portable and connected diagnostic devices. While these tools may expand the scope of bedside assessment and enable more reproducible and shareable clinical signs, their value depends on appropriate validation, usability, workflow integration, training, and supportive financial and organizational conditions. Regular evidence-informed updates of equipment recommendations, alongside practical implementation support, may help primary care systems adopt useful innovations while preserving the human dimensions of clinical care.