Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Participatory Medicine (no longer under consideration since May 12, 2018)

Date Submitted: Nov 9, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 10, 2017 - May 12, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

What Does the Term “Knowledge” Mean as It Is Used in Writings about Participatory Decision-Making in Health and Medicine? An Analysis of Patient Knowledge and Physician Knowledge

  • Dennis Mazur

ABSTRACT In this paper, we examine the types of knowledge that are found in participatory decision-making in medicine. Sometimes, the engagement in participation medicine involves only two types of knowledge: “patient knowledge” (in the forms of self-knowledge, experiential knowledge, and understanding and use of scientific knowledge) and “physician knowledge” (in the forms of scientific knowledge, clinical training, and clinical experience). Sometimes, the engagement in participation medicine involves others in addition to the patient and physician. These others include significant others in the patient’s life, and general and subspecialty physicians caring for the patient as consultants. Other times, there is involvement of experts in the cognitive sciences, decision scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and those who are involved in developing decision tools potentially useful to the patient in more collaborative decision frameworks. This paper is divided into two parts, and each part is divided into two sections. Each part begins with an examination of patient and physician knowledge in the patient-physician relationship and then analyzes the potential contributions of the patient, physician, and other experts in expanded frameworks involving patient knowledge production in the setting of organizations and societies, nationally and internationally. Regarding patient knowledge, first we analyze patient “self-knowledge” and “experiential knowledge” that is shared with physicians and others in the patient-physician decision-making regarding the patient’s health and medical care. Second, we examine how knowledge gained through a patient’s own manifested and anticipated experiences in development of new knowledge platforms leads to more patients sharing what they gained from reflecting on their self-knowledge and experiential knowledge as shared in “communities of participation” and participating in organizations and societies involved in “patient knowledge production.” Regarding physician knowledge, first we examine scientific knowledge initially provided by the physician to the patient in the patient’s health and medical care decision-making. Second, we examine the inclusion of others and the use of decision tools in the more complex area of “collaborative decision-making.”


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mazur D

What Does the Term “Knowledge” Mean as It Is Used in Writings about Participatory Decision-Making in Health and Medicine? An Analysis of Patient Knowledge and Physician Knowledge

JMIR Preprints. 09/11/2017:9383

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.9383

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/9383

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.