Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2026
Date Accepted: Jun 25, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Gender Inclusivity and Exclusivity in US Hospitals’ Online Obstetrics, Labor and Delivery, and Pregnancy-Related Resources: Cross-Sectional Study

Coward CO, Howell JL

Gender Inclusivity and Exclusivity in US Hospitals’ Online Obstetrics, Labor and Delivery, and Pregnancy-Related Resources: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e93770

DOI: 10.2196/93770

Gender Inclusivity and Exclusivity in U.S. Hospitals’ Online Obstetrics and Labor and Delivery Resources: Cross-Sectional Study

  • Charlie O Coward; 
  • Jennifer L Howell

ABSTRACT

Background:

Research on transgender health, particularly in reproductive health, has expanded exponentially over the past decades. However, previous studies frequently highlight perceived inaccessibility and gender-exclusivity of reproductive and perinatal care for transgender people.

Objective:

This cross-sectional content analysis examined online obstetrics, labor and delivery, and pregnancy-related materials from purposive sample of 180 online hospital resources across the United States to understand the extent to which they use gender-inclusive and gender-exclusive language, imagery, and other inclusive symbolism.

Methods:

Two hundred U.S. hospitals were purposively selected from the most populous cities per state; 20 lacking obstetrics pages were excluded, yielding 180 across all 50 states. Four coders assessed obstetrics websites (Oct-Dec 2025) for trans-specific resources, inclusive language, second person language, exclusive language, inclusive imagery, and symbols/statements. Hospitals were categorized by U.S. Census region, trans-specific legal protections, and university/religious affiliation.

Results:

Across the U.S., presence of gender-inclusive elements were relatively rare, while most hospitals utilized second-person or gender-exclusive elements consistently. These patterns persisted across geographic regions, university affiliations, religious affiliation, and variation in state-level transgender-specific legal protections, although hospitals in more protective states and university-affiliated institutions showed somewhat higher rates of inclusive content. Importantly, even on websites that included gender-inclusive language, such content co-occurred with gender-exclusive terms, raising questions about how TGD patients interpret these mixed signals when deciding where to seek care.

Conclusions:

Findings underscore the need for hospitals to develop clear, service-specific standards for gender-inclusive obstetric communication and to ensure that online materials visibly and consistently signal readiness to care for TGD patients across the perinatal period.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Coward CO, Howell JL

Gender Inclusivity and Exclusivity in US Hospitals’ Online Obstetrics, Labor and Delivery, and Pregnancy-Related Resources: Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e93770

DOI: 10.2196/93770

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.