Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Feb 18, 2026
Date Accepted: Jun 25, 2026
Gender Inclusivity and Exclusivity in U.S. Hospitals’ Online Obstetrics and Labor and Delivery Resources: Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Research on transgender health, particularly in reproductive health, has expanded exponentially over the past decades. However, previous studies frequently highlight perceived inaccessibility and gender-exclusivity of reproductive and perinatal care for transgender people.
Objective:
This cross-sectional content analysis examined online obstetrics, labor and delivery, and pregnancy-related materials from purposive sample of 180 online hospital resources across the United States to understand the extent to which they use gender-inclusive and gender-exclusive language, imagery, and other inclusive symbolism.
Methods:
Two hundred U.S. hospitals were purposively selected from the most populous cities per state; 20 lacking obstetrics pages were excluded, yielding 180 across all 50 states. Four coders assessed obstetrics websites (Oct-Dec 2025) for trans-specific resources, inclusive language, second person language, exclusive language, inclusive imagery, and symbols/statements. Hospitals were categorized by U.S. Census region, trans-specific legal protections, and university/religious affiliation.
Results:
Across the U.S., presence of gender-inclusive elements were relatively rare, while most hospitals utilized second-person or gender-exclusive elements consistently. These patterns persisted across geographic regions, university affiliations, religious affiliation, and variation in state-level transgender-specific legal protections, although hospitals in more protective states and university-affiliated institutions showed somewhat higher rates of inclusive content. Importantly, even on websites that included gender-inclusive language, such content co-occurred with gender-exclusive terms, raising questions about how TGD patients interpret these mixed signals when deciding where to seek care.
Conclusions:
Findings underscore the need for hospitals to develop clear, service-specific standards for gender-inclusive obstetric communication and to ensure that online materials visibly and consistently signal readiness to care for TGD patients across the perinatal period.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.