Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Feb 15, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 19, 2026 - Apr 16, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A qualitative study of Clinical Nurses’ Expectations and Learning Experiences Regarding Self-Directed Online Training on Evidence-Based Practice. #Evidencer Project.

  • Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo; 
  • José Antonio Vera-Pérez; 
  • Serafín Fernández-Salazar; 
  • Jessica García-González; 
  • María Ruzafa-Martínez

ABSTRACT

Evidence-based Practice (EBP) is essential for ensuring optimal healthcare and improving patient outcomes. Despite its importance, nurses' competence in EBP remains limited globally. While self-directed digital education has emerged as a flexible alternative for professional development, there is a lack of qualitative research exploring how clinical nurses experience and perceive this specific learning modality within the EBP framework. To explore the learning expectations and experiences of clinical nurses who participated in the #Evidencer Project, a self-directed online training program focused on EBP. A qualitative study using inductive thematic analysis was conducted, following the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines. Fifteen clinical nurses from primary and hospital care settings in Spain participated. They completed an 80-hour, 12-week self-directed online course structured around the seven steps of EBP. Data were collected through virtual semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was performed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach with MAXQDA 24 software until thematic saturation was achieved. Three main categories emerged: 1)Motivation and expectations: Nurses were primarily driven by intrinsic motivation, a desire for professional updating, and their responsibility as tutors for undergraduate and graduate students; 2) Experience with the training: Participants valued the nursing-specific design, clarity, and flexibility of the online platform. However, they identified the need for synchronous tutoring to resolve complex doubts and requested downloadable materials for future consultation; and 3) EBP worldview: Findings revealed a partial understanding of the EBP process, persistent confusion between research and EBP, and a perception that clinical implementation is complex and "distant" without institutional support. Self-directed online training is a well-received and effective tool for acquiring theoretical EBP knowledge. However, it is insufficient as a standalone intervention for clinical implementation. Healthcare institutions must provide structural support and integrated strategies within the clinical context to complement educational efforts and facilitate the application of evidence in daily practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Vera-Pérez JA, Fernández-Salazar S, García-González J, Ruzafa-Martínez M

A qualitative study of Clinical Nurses’ Expectations and Learning Experiences Regarding Self-Directed Online Training on Evidence-Based Practice. #Evidencer Project.

JMIR Preprints. 15/02/2026:93586

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93586

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93586

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.