Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Participatory Medicine

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 23, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Adapting an online PROM portal for paediatric physiotherapy: a co-design process

  • Selina Limmen; 
  • Hedy A van Oers; 
  • Dorinde L Korteling; 
  • Michiel A.J. Luijten; 
  • Lotte Haverman; 
  • Raoul H.H. Engelbert; 
  • Eugene A.A. Rameckers; 
  • Marjolijn Ketelaar; 
  • Manon Bloemen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and shared decision-making (SDM) are increasingly valued in Pediatric physiotherapy (PPT). Online PROM portals can facilitate PROM use and SDM, but require adaptation for its use in PPT.

Objective:

This study aimed to adapt the online KLIK PROM portal for primary PPT, identify preferences for data visualization, and explore integration of SDM.

Methods:

A co-design approach was used. Two co-creation sessions including adolescents, parents, patient representatives, PPTs, and researchers were organized and results were discussed in an analyze-session with the research team. Subsequently, a demo version of the adapted KLIK portal was tested for usability in twelve individual think aloud sessions with parents, adolescents, and PPTs. After discussing results in a second analyze-session, the final version of the KLIK PROM portal was developed. Thematic content analysis was applied to all qualitative data.

Results:

Key adaptations included automatically selecting predefined PROM sets based on the patient registration form depending on complaints and age, and the possibility to schedule a series of PROMs linked to evaluation moments. Literal responses on items without color coding were preferred by patients and parents, while PPTs favored line graphs with heatmaps indicating concerning scores. Both patients and PPTs emphasized the importance of discussing results in person using child-friendly visualizations. Aggregated data were valued for supporting reflective practice. SDM was integrated into the portal through information pages, subtle nudges to encourage PPTs and patients to engage in SDM, and by motivating patients to complete PROMs by personalizing the portal.

Conclusions:

The adapted KLIK portal is ready for pilot implementation in primary PPT. Updates should be applied based on user feedback from ongoing evaluations. While PROM use can facilitate SDM, impact on SDM depends on effective patient-clinician dialogue and should be further investigated.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Limmen S, van Oers HA, Korteling DL, Luijten MA, Haverman L, Engelbert RH, Rameckers EA, Ketelaar M, Bloemen M

Adapting an online PROM portal for paediatric physiotherapy: a co-design process

JMIR Preprints. 12/02/2026:93430

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93430

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93430

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.