Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Feb 13, 2026
Date Accepted: Jun 10, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Footwear Interactions in Adult Healthy and Patient Populations: Systematic Review of Biomechanical Outcomes

Millar A, Greve C, Hijmans JM

Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Footwear Interactions in Adult Healthy and Patient Populations: Systematic Review of Biomechanical Outcomes

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e93423

DOI: 10.2196/93423

PMID: 42869424

Ankle-foot orthosis and footwear interactions in adult healthy and patient populations: a systematic review of biomechanical outcomes

  • Alexandra Millar; 
  • Christian Greve; 
  • Juha M. Hijmans

ABSTRACT

Background:

Both ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and footwear adaptations are used to improve gait across a broad range of neuromuscular disorders. AFOs and footwear can each independently influence gait through the manipulation of certain design parameters, such as AFO footplate stiffness or the use of a forefoot rocker. While the effects of design parameters from ankle-foot orthoses and footwear on gait have been investigated independently, how these parameters interact to influence walking biomechanics remains poorly understood

Objective:

This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of the interacting effects between AFOs and footwear on gait biomechanics from both a theoretical standpoint and through the synthesis of existing literature.

Methods:

A search of existing literature was conducted across four major databases. Studies were eligible if they included adult participants from healthy or patient populations. The study must have investigated biomechanical gait outcomes recorded during walking with an AFO and at least two different footwear conditions. Quality assessment was performed using the Downs and Black checklist and AFO reporting guidelines.

Results:

A total of 14 studies were included in this review. Across these 14 studies a total of 204 participants (108 healthy, 84 stroke patients, 12 unilateral ankle weakness/pain) were included. The majority of these studies were within-subjects designs. Footwear adaptations were primarily changes to the heel-sole differential (HSD) (7/14), followed by forefoot rockers (4/14), with some studies on changes to heel shape and hardness (3/14), and a study on medio-lateral wedging. These adaptations were used in combination with primarily rigid AFOs (10/14) with studies also using dorsiflexion free and frontal plane restrictive AFOs.

Conclusions:

Increasing the HSD can be used to increase knee flexion across stance phase in rigid AFO users, including in third rocker when HSD is manipulated between the shoe and AFO. Beyond changing the HSD, there is a lack of well-designed experimental studies exploring footwear adaptations. Detailed reporting of both ankle-foot orthosis and footwear design choices is necessary for future works in order to make informed statements on biomechanics. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO (CRD42024625819)


 Citation

Please cite as:

Millar A, Greve C, Hijmans JM

Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Footwear Interactions in Adult Healthy and Patient Populations: Systematic Review of Biomechanical Outcomes

JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e93423

DOI: 10.2196/93423

PMID: 42869424

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.