Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Feb 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 17, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Predicting Care Needs Among Older Adults Using Explainable Machine Learning: A Multidimensional Approach Integrating Health, Social, and Environmental Factors

  • Hyeri ‍Shin

ABSTRACT

Background:

Rapid population aging and a worsening shortage of care workers necessitates the identification of older adults who require proactive interventions. Although machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied in gerontology, existing studies have predominantly focused on social isolation.

Objective:

This study aims to develop a robust predictive model for care needs using ML. Beyond physical health indicators such as disease and functional status, this study adopted a comprehensive approach including mental health, cognitive function, health behaviors, and socio–environmental determinants—such as social participation, social support, and housing environment—to present an integrated model encompassing both health and social care needs.

Methods:

Data were obtained from the 2023 Korea Senior Survey, a nationally representative sample of adults aged 60 and older. A set of candidate predictors was initially screened using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm. Subsequently, we trained and compared 7 predictive models—logistic regression, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, gradient boosting decision tree, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and precision-recall AUC. Model interpretability was enhanced using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to quantify the contributions of individual predictors.

Results:

Among the evaluated models, XGBoost demonstrated the highest predictive performance. SHAP analysis revealed that limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were the most influential predictors. Age, nutritional risk, depression, subjective health, work, cognitive function, home modification, and income emerged as the top predictors when functional status was excluded. These findings indicate that care needs are driven not only by functional impairment but also by distinct sociodemographic factors.

Conclusions:

Explainable ML models offer high predictive accuracy and strong interpretability for identifying care needs among older adults. By highlighting the significant roles of health, social, and environmental factors, this study provides empirical evidence to support evidence-based decision-making for the Long-Term Care Insurance system and integrated community care policies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

‍Shin H

Predicting Care Needs Among Older Adults Using Explainable Machine Learning: A Multidimensional Approach Integrating Health, Social, and Environmental Factors

JMIR Preprints. 12/02/2026:93371

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93371

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93371

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.