Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Feb 11, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 27, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Design Priorities for a Digital Advance Care Planning Tool to Support People Living with Dementia: International Stakeholder Survey and Mixed Methods Analysis

  • Ana Milošič; 
  • Urška Smrke; 
  • Izidor Mlakar

ABSTRACT

Background:

Dementia is a progressive, life-limiting condition in which care needs evolve from diagnosis through end of life, yet advance care planning (ACP) is often approached as a narrow, document-focused end-of-life task. Digital ACP tools could help integrate ACP with earlier palliative care principles, but priorities for a comprehensive dementia-specific tool remain insufficiently defined.

Objective:

To identify and prioritize stakeholder-defined components and digital features for a comprehensive digital ACP (dACP) tool for dementia that integrates palliative care principles across the disease trajectory.

Methods:

We conducted an online survey with people with dementia, informal caregivers, and health care professionals recruited via Prolific in January–February 2025. Participants rated the importance of dementia-tailored ACP elements, caregiver-support features, preferred frequency of care-plan review prompts, and the importance of integration with existing health care systems; open-ended responses were analysed using thematic analysis supported by a large language model and refined by researchers. Principal component analysis was used to derive core domains, and group differences and correlations among central variables were assessed.

Results:

The final sample included 232 participants. PCA identified two interrelated ACP domains, the Comprehensive Care Planning and End-of-Life Preparation and Active Disease Symptom Management and a caregiver domain capturing Caregiver Stress Management. Across items, strategies for maintaining quality of life as dementia progresses received the highest ratings. Tips for managing challenging behaviours were the highest-rated caregiver-support feature. Participants also rated integration with existing health care systems as highly important and were in favour or context aware regular plan review. Qualitatively, decision-making support and guidance, communication/information sharing and documentation/record-keeping were the most frequently cited primary purposes of a dACP tool across all groups.

Conclusions:

Stakeholders prioritized a dACP tool that supports quality of life, ongoing symptom management, and actionable caregiver support, with strong interoperability to enable clinical use across care settings. These results provide practical design targets for developing an integrated, adaptive tool to support shared decision-making and continuity of person-cantered early palliative care in dementia.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Milošič A, Smrke U, Mlakar I

Design Priorities for a Digital Advance Care Planning Tool to Support People Living with Dementia: International Stakeholder Survey and Mixed Methods Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 11/02/2026:93323

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93323

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93323

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.