Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2026
Date Accepted: May 18, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Perceptions of a Digitally Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: Qualitative Study Among Pilot Trial Participants

Carter J, Swack N, Rehman N, Reyes-Richards Y, Donelan K, Thorndike A

Patient Perceptions of a Digitally Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: Qualitative Study Among Pilot Trial Participants

JMIR Cardio 2026;10:e93288

DOI: 10.2196/93288

PMID: 42241676

Patient Perceptions of a Digitally-Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: A Qualitative Study

  • Jocelyn Carter; 
  • Natalia Swack; 
  • Narmeen Rehman; 
  • Yadira Reyes-Richards; 
  • Karen Donelan; 
  • Anne Thorndike

ABSTRACT

Background:

Most studies targeting patient experience in managing heart failure (HF) at home focus on social isolation and medication management. Few have explored patient experience associated with a digitally-enabled community health worker intervention within a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Objective:

To identify patient perceptions related to a digitally-enabled community health worker intervention implemented within a pilot trial.

Methods:

Adults (age ≥18) with HF receiving care at a single health care institution and with a history of hospital admission in the previous 12 months were enrolled and randomized to the intervention arm of a pilot trial July - November 2021. Intervention participants (N=19) were paired with a CHW and digital platform (tracking heart rate, oxygenation, blood pressure, body weight, steps taken, symptoms, and offering educational videos). Qualitative interviews were performed after the 30-day intervention. Key interview domains included: barriers and facilitators to the intervention, use of CHW care in HF at home, remote monitoring in HF, and the use of technology in HF.

Results:

Interviews with participants (N=19; mean age 62.1 ±15.1 years) yielded five key themes: (1) The combined intervention was well-received; CHWs made the use of the digital platform more approachable; (2) The digital platform enhanced HF knowledge and confidence in self-care; (3) Digital platform use was easy to integrate into daily routines; (4) In addition to assisting with navigation of unmet social needs (e.g., transportation, insurance benefit, food access), CHWs provided emotional support and increased motivation for clinical care plan adherence and platform use. (5) Connectivity issues and other technical challenges occurred with digital platform use.

Conclusions:

Participant perspectives underscored the individual and combined value of an intervention combining a digital platform with CHW care in the home setting. Specifically, CHWs played a key role in making the platform more approachable for participant use. Further research is needed in multi-center trial settings powered to test the benefit of such an intervention for HF populations in both academic and community-based care settings. Clinical Trial: NCT05130008


 Citation

Please cite as:

Carter J, Swack N, Rehman N, Reyes-Richards Y, Donelan K, Thorndike A

Patient Perceptions of a Digitally Enabled Community Health Worker Intervention: Qualitative Study Among Pilot Trial Participants

JMIR Cardio 2026;10:e93288

DOI: 10.2196/93288

PMID: 42241676

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.