Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Date Submitted: Feb 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 19, 2026 - Apr 16, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Usability and Adherence of visually impaired to asynchronous telerehabilitation: a multicentre study.

  • Margherita Guidobaldi; 
  • Valeria Silvestri; 
  • Marco Sulfaro; 
  • Paola Piscopo; 
  • Simona Turco; 
  • Fabiana Perna; 
  • Leonardo Mastropasqua; 
  • Giovanna Carnovale Scalzo; 
  • Elisabetta Falchini; 
  • Liliana Pollazzi; 
  • Giovanni Giacomelli; 
  • Gianni Virgili; 
  • Gianfrancesco M. Villani; 
  • Michelle Markowitz; 
  • Monica Daibert-Nido; 
  • Samuel N. Markowitz; 
  • Filippo Amore

ABSTRACT

Background:

Telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising approach for delivering low vision rehabilitation services remotely; however, evidence regarding its usability, patient adherence, and effectiveness remains limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate usability and patient adherence to a low vision telerehabilitation program. Secondary objectives were to assess its effectiveness and clinical benefits.

Methods:

Forty-four visually impaired participants with various ocular pathologies were enrolled from five low vision rehabilitation centers. The telerehabilitation software was individually configured for each participant. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed before and after completion of the rehabilitation program. Moreover, usability was assessed using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), administered after completion of the telerehabilitation sessions.

Results:

The overall mean PSSUQ score was 1.85 (SD = 0.96), indicating high perceived usability. Mean scores for System Usefulness, Information Quality, and Interface Quality were 1.45 (SD = 0.87), 1.77 (SD = 1.50), and 2.01 (SD = 1.32), respectively. High adherence was observed, with 41 participants completing the prescribed exercises. The mean overall completion rate was 97.2% (SD = 5.2). Statistically significant improvements were found in binocular reading acuity and contrast sensitivity after training (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions:

Both participants and low vision therapists reported positive evaluations regarding the usability and acceptability of the telerehabilitation program. The findings suggest that low vision telerehabilitation is feasible and effective, with significant improvements in visual performance, particularly in reading acuity and contrast sensitivity.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Guidobaldi M, Silvestri V, Sulfaro M, Piscopo P, Turco S, Perna F, Mastropasqua L, Carnovale Scalzo G, Falchini E, Pollazzi L, Giacomelli G, Virgili G, Villani GM, Markowitz M, Daibert-Nido M, Markowitz SN, Amore F

Usability and Adherence of visually impaired to asynchronous telerehabilitation: a multicentre study.

JMIR Preprints. 09/02/2026:93158

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93158

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93158

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.