Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Jul 17, 2026)

Date Submitted: Feb 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 19, 2026 - Apr 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience and Optimization Pathways of a Trusted Paperless Electronic Medical Record Management System Among Medical Record Administrators in a Tertiary Hospital in China: A Descriptive Qualitative Study

  • Hao Huang; 
  • Song Li; 
  • Yingmei Deng; 
  • Yinghong Fu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Trusted paperless electronic medical record (TPEMR) management system serves as critical infrastructure for hospital governance and compliance under the National Health Commission’s Electronic Medical Record System Application Level Grading Evaluation (CN-EMR Grading) framework in China. Understanding user experience (UX) with system usability, trust, and sustained engagement may improve the accessibility, acceptability, and sustained adoption of the administrative health information system.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to use the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a framework for qualitatively describing the UX, use behaviors, intent to use and intent to continue using among medical record administrators.

Methods:

We conducted a descriptive qualitative study guided by the extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in a tertiary hospital achieving CN-EMR Grade 5. Through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with medical record administrators (n=23) and information system–related personnel (n=5), we examined perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), intent to use and intent to continue using by a trained coder. To enhance analytic rigor and credibility, the coder met weekly with the principal investigator to review coding decisions, resolve ambiguities, and ensure that interpretations remained grounded in the data.

Results:

Participants acknowledged TPEMR's routine efficiency in retrieval, batch printing, and compliance reporting. However, exception-handling workflows triggered significant usability breakdowns. "Surface usability, deep complexity" emerged as a core pattern: standardized tasks felt intuitive, while deviations required opaque, multi-step workarounds across departments. Recurrent system instabilities and non-actionable error messages eroded psychological trust, fostering defensive behaviors like manual tracking despite mandatory use policies.

Conclusions:

TPEMR optimization must move beyond happy-path efficiency to address exception-path resilience. Embedding visible compliance mechanisms, streamlining cross-departmental coordination, and providing transparent error recovery pathways are critical to converting mandated use into genuine, sustainable engagement among medical record administrators.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Huang H, Li S, Deng Y, Fu Y

Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience and Optimization Pathways of a Trusted Paperless Electronic Medical Record Management System Among Medical Record Administrators in a Tertiary Hospital in China: A Descriptive Qualitative Study

JMIR Preprints. 09/02/2026:93103

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93103

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93103

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.