Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 8, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 8, 2026 - Apr 5, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Feasibility of using wearable devices to examine the relationship between sleep and balance: a case study with two college students

  • Yuan Li; 
  • Hongwu Wang; 
  • Raghuveer Chandrashekhar; 
  • Jordan Major; 
  • Mahek Chandna; 
  • Stefanie Bodison

ABSTRACT

This case study examined the feasibility of using consumer-grade wearable devices for longitudinal sleep tracking and explored how changes in sleep patterns relate to balance performance. Two college students participated over four months: Participant 1 (P1) used an Apple Watch Series 5 and an OURA ring; Participant 2 (P2) used a Fitbit Charge 5 and an OURA ring. Participants were assigned different wearable devices to assess device-specific feasibility and variability in sleep-tracking accuracy. Sleep data were collected continuously, including time in bed (TIB), total sleep time, sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset (WASO), sleep stages, and sleep onset timing. Both participants also completed a daily sleep diary and underwent monthly balance assessments using the Bertec® Balance Advantage Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Wearables showed varying accuracy in estimating TIB: the OURA ring overestimated TIB by 15–22 minutes, the Fitbit by 27 minutes, while the Apple Watch slightly underestimated it by 9 minutes. Excellent agreement was observed in sleep duration estimates between the OURA ring and Apple Watch (ICC=0.97) and between the OURA and Fitbit (ICC=0.99), but agreement was lower for WASO, deep sleep, and sleep efficiency. Sleep variability appeared to influence balance outcomes. Fluctuations in sleep timing and duration corresponded to changes in SOT visual subscale scores, suggesting increased postural sway with irregular sleep patterns. Missing data rates were acceptable, ranging from 0–25% across devices. For P1, missingness was highest for the OURA (25%) and Fitbit (20.3%), but zero for the sleep diary. For P2, the Apple Watch had a 14.1% missing rate, the OURA 9.4%, and the sleep diary 6.25%. In conclusion, all tested wearables demonstrated feasibility for long-term sleep monitoring, though measurement discrepancies highlight the need to align device choice with research goals. Variations in sleep consistency may affect postural stability, reinforcing the importance of accurate, continuous sleep tracking in balance research. Due to the small sample size, findings are illustrative and not generalizable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li Y, Wang H, Chandrashekhar R, Major J, Chandna M, Bodison S

Feasibility of using wearable devices to examine the relationship between sleep and balance: a case study with two college students

JMIR Preprints. 08/02/2026:93019

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.93019

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/93019

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.