Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 6, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Are Reddit Users Giving Evidence-Based Advice? An Evaluation of Depression and Anxiety Guidance in r/mentalhealth

  • Yu Takizawa; 
  • Ehsan Abedin; 
  • Joanne Glover; 
  • Peivand Bastani

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online platforms such as Reddit are increasingly used to seek mental health information and peer support, particularly for depression and anxiety. These spaces offer anonymity and accessibility, which may be valuable for individuals who experience mental health stigma. However, concerns persist regarding the accuracy and safety of peer-generated advice, and empirical evidence on whether community-endorsed advice aligns with established clinical guidelines remains limited.

Objective:

This study examined the extent to which highly ranked peer advice on Reddit’s r/mentalhealth subreddit for depression and anxiety aligns with evidence-based international and Australian clinical guidelines.

Methods:

A cross-sectional qualitative content analysis was conducted on 1,065 publicly available Reddit posts related to depression and/or anxiety and their top-ranked advice. Posts were classified as containing action-based advice or non-action-based expressions using a large language model with manual verification. Action-based advice was thematically analyzed and mapped against recommendations from established national and international clinical guidelines, including NICE, WHO mhGAP, and Australian frameworks.

Results:

Among the dataset, 327 anxiety-related posts and 243 depression-related posts contained action-based advice. Six overarching advice categories were identified: (1) seeking professional help, (2) behavioral and lifestyle changes, (3) emotional regulation and cognitive strategies, (4) interpersonal and social dynamics, (5) self-prioritization and life direction, and (6) crisis and immediate safety. Seeking professional help was the most frequently endorsed category for both depression and anxiety. Overall, most action-based advice aligned with evidence-based guidelines, particularly recommendations related to professional help-seeking, behavioral activation, and emotional regulation. Partial or non-alignment was more common in complex or high-risk contexts, such as crisis situations or interpersonal conflict.

Conclusions:

Highly ranked mental health advice on Reddit frequently aligns with evidence-based guidance, suggesting that community-endorsed content may offer meaningful and broadly appropriate support for individuals experiencing depression or anxiety. Nonetheless, limitations remain in complex and high-risk situations. These findings highlight the potential role of online peer-support platforms as complementary sources of guidance and underscore the need for continued research into their public health implications.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Takizawa Y, Abedin E, Glover J, Bastani P

Are Reddit Users Giving Evidence-Based Advice? An Evaluation of Depression and Anxiety Guidance in r/mentalhealth

JMIR Preprints. 06/02/2026:92971

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.92971

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/92971

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.