Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 6, 2026 - Apr 3, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Consensus-Based Recommendations for Optimizing Diversified TCM Data Collection during Clinical Work

  • Chen Zhao; 
  • Aomeng Zhang; 
  • Xinyi Zhang; 
  • Yin Jiang; 
  • Mengzhu Zhao; 
  • Zhiyue Guan; 
  • Xinfeng Guo; 
  • Long Ge; 
  • Xuan Zhang; 
  • Bo Li; 
  • Yan Li; 
  • Yuting Duan; 
  • Yinghui Jin; 
  • Zhaoxiang Bian; 
  • Hongcai Shang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

An increasing amount of TCM clinical data can be collected by software and equipment, forming diversified TCM data, which should typically be collected alongside clinical work. TCM diagnosis and treatment data collection is conducted concurrently with clinical work, typically. However, with the limited time, space, and human resources available in clinical work, collecting diversified TCM Data is difficult, which may affect the quality of the collected data.

Objective:

Objective:

To develop recommendations for optimizing diversified traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) data collection.

Methods:

Method: A working group comprising 12 members was established. Based on previous survey findings regarding the burden of clinical data collection, the group developed a preliminary list of recommendations for optimizing diversified TCM data collection. A Delphi survey was conducted to investigate consensus levels(using a 5-point Likert scale for importance evaluation) on the list items, and open-ended opinions were also surveyed. If experts in the first round propose additions, deletions, or modifications, or if there is a lack of consensus on certain items, a next round of surveys will be conducted to obtain the experts' agreement rate on the related items.

Results:

Results:

A total of 86 experts from China, the United Kingdom, and Singapore completed two rounds of surveys. Following the first Delphi survey, all items achieved agreement scores above 4, with coefficients of variation(CV) below 0.2. The working group revised 12 items based on open-ended opinions and resubmitted them for agreement assessment. All revised items achieved agreement rates of over 95%. Following the two-round survey process, the final version of the recommendations comprises 5 primary domains, 11 sub-domains, and 25 items.

Conclusions:

Conclusion: This study formulated recommendations for optimizing diversified TCM data collection. It is hoped that these recommendations will help clinical data collectors consider data collection in advance during the design phase


 Citation

Please cite as:

Zhao C, Zhang A, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Zhao M, Guan Z, Guo X, Ge L, Zhang X, Li B, Li Y, Duan Y, Jin Y, Bian Z, Shang H

Consensus-Based Recommendations for Optimizing Diversified TCM Data Collection during Clinical Work

JMIR Preprints. 05/02/2026:92935

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.92935

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/92935

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.