Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Mar 29, 2018)
Date Submitted: Oct 30, 2017
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 30, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Understanding User Reactions and Interactions with an Internet-Based Intervention for Tinnitus Self-Management: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
Background:
Tinnitus is a common symptom that can affect an individual’s quality of life, requiring psychological support that is not readily accessible. Internet-based interventions have the potential to reduce the disparity in access to psychological support that people with tinnitus currently experience. One example is the Tinnitus E-Programme, which was developed in the UK to support self-management in people with tinnitus. Although freely available online, it had not been formally evaluated.
Objective:
To carry out a process evaluation to explore past, current, and new users’ reactions and interactions with the Tinnitus E-Programme.
Methods:
Study 1 used an online survey to gather past and current users’ reactions to and interactions with the intervention (n=27). Study 2 used interviews and a relaxation log to explore this aim with new users and assess how well they were able to implement the skills they learned during the intervention in their everyday lives (n=13). Findings were triangulated to develop an in-depth understanding of the intervention’s mechanisms of impact and identify any implementation or contextual factors that strengthen or impede its delivery and functioning.
Results:
Generally, users expressed positive views of the Tinnitus E-Programme content and design features. Users particularly valued the education about tinnitus and its management, and relaxation skills training, whereas reactions and usage of the self-monitoring tools, online support forum, and therapist support were mixed. Implementation was limited by instances of poor usability and accessibility, user engagement, and adherence to relaxation goals. Users’ perceptions of the intervention’s credibility and relevance, and beliefs regarding the intervention’s negative impact on their tinnitus influenced their engagement with the intervention. Users in both studies identified several benefits gained from the intervention, including functional and emotional management; self-efficacy for managing and coping with tinnitus; understanding tinnitus and its management; social support; and acceptance of tinnitus.
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that acceptability was high among the target group but also highlighted some areas for improvement. These findings will be used to inform further development work.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.