Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Cardio

Date Submitted: Jan 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 3, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Automated Pattern Recognition in Cardiological Conditions: A Case Study on Shockable Rhythm Detection

  • Sebastian Siegel; 
  • Milla Juutinen; 
  • Antti Vehkaoja; 
  • Niku Oksala; 
  • Christoph B. Olivier; 
  • Martin Eichenlaub; 
  • Johannes Steinfurt; 
  • Adrian Heidenreich; 
  • Lisa Lyssenko; 
  • Christian Haverkamp

ABSTRACT

Automated detection of shockable cardiac rhythms plays a critical role in improving patient outcomes during sudden cardiac arrest. Conventional automated external defibrillators (AEDs) rely on handcrafted feature engineering, limiting adaptability. This study explores a deep learning-based approach combining Residual Neural Networks (ResNets), ECG spectrogram representations, and block-based evaluation to enhance shockable rhythm detection. Additionally, expert reannotation of misclassified cases refines model performance and highlights inconsistencies in database labels, which can pose challenges for short-segment-based learning approaches. Four public arrhythmia databases (MIT-BIH Arrhythmia, Creighton Ventricular Tachycardia, MIT-BIH Ventricular Arrhythmia, and American Heart Association) were used to develop and optimize the ResNet32 model. A balanced dataset of 60,340 augmented segments was generated for training. The model classifies ECG rhythms using blocks of three consecutive 3-second segments, providing a shock decision over a 9-second window. Performance was evaluated via leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on the original dataset, consisting of 19,802 blocks (2,495 shockable). The model achieved 99.68% accuracy, 99.63% sensitivity, and 99.69% specificity. After expert cardiologist review of misclassified blocks, where 73% of annotations differed from database labels, performance improved to 99.92%, 99.76%, and 99.87%, respectively. The block-based approach reduces false positives from transient rhythms, aligns with clinical assessment practices, and mitigates annotation inconsistencies. While introducing a brief detection delay (up to 9 seconds), it ensures decision reliability and mirrors real-world AED use, where rhythm persistence is evaluated before delivering a shock. Future applications include real-world mobile deployment, generating standardized ECG databases, and detecting other cardiac conditions such as QT prolongation and electrolyte imbalances.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Siegel S, Juutinen M, Vehkaoja A, Oksala N, Olivier CB, Eichenlaub M, Steinfurt J, Heidenreich A, Lyssenko L, Haverkamp C

Automated Pattern Recognition in Cardiological Conditions: A Case Study on Shockable Rhythm Detection

JMIR Preprints. 29/01/2026:92424

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.92424

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/92424

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.