Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Jan 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 29, 2026 - Mar 26, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
AI-assisted translation and psychometric evaluation of the Digital Competencies for Applied Practitioners Scale (DCAPP) in a sample of Swedish psychology master’s students
ABSTRACT
Background:
As psychological practice becomes increasingly digitalized, the demand for competencies in digital psychology is growing. Although competency frameworks for digital clinical practice exists, validated instruments to assess these competencies remain scarce. In Sweden, psychology master’s students are now being offered courses in digital clinical psychology, increasing the need for instruments to measure intended improvements in knowledge and abilities. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to assist translation procedures can facilitate the adaptation of existing instruments to new national and cultural context.
Objective:
To test an AI-assisted procedure for the translation and contextual adaptation of the Digital Competencies for Applied Psychological Practitioner (DCAPP) scale to Swedish. To examine the psychometric properties of the translated version on a sample of psychology master’s students in Sweden, including pilot testing of the instruments responsiveness to change in knowledge and abilities among students attending a course in digital clinical psychology.
Methods:
An AI-assisted adaptation procedure, using ChatGPT and DeepL, was used to translate the DCAPP from English to Swedish. The Swedish version was distributed to psychology master’s students during their eighth semester, including those attending an elective course in digital clinical psychology. Twenty-four students completed the baseline measurement. Nine out of 14 students that attended the course also provided data at follow-up. Item descriptives, internal consistency and responsiveness to change were calculated for the scale.
Results:
The AI-assisted translation procedure resulted in a translated version of the scale with both high quality and semantic similarity ratings. The Swedish DCAPP demonstrated excellent internal consistency for total score (α = .96), and also for knowledge (α = .93) and ability (α = .96) subscales. It demonstrated acceptable item distributions with item-total correlation above .30 (range: 0.53-0.87) and mean-item correlation for subscales were acceptable but indicated potential item redundancy (Knowledge r=.48; Abilities r=.61). Whilst skewness and kurtosis values were mostly acceptable, high floor effects were observed in both subscales. A statistically significant increase in students’ competency ratings was observed at post-test (P<.001), suggesting good sensitivity to change.
Conclusions:
Using an AI-assisted adaptation procedure to support translation is feasible. The Swedish DCAPP showed promising psychometric properties and preliminary evidence of responsiveness to change. Floor effects may have been due to students limited digital competencies. Although initial results are promising, further research with larger samples is needed before the Swedish DCAPP’s psychometric validity can be confirmed.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.