Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Jan 15, 2026
Date Accepted: Jun 3, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Shift From Efficacy to Implementation Science (2020-2026) in Nursing Practice for Digital Mental Health: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Yu S, Qian L, Wu H

The Shift From Efficacy to Implementation Science (2020-2026) in Nursing Practice for Digital Mental Health: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e91498

DOI: 10.2196/91498

PMID: 42418354

Digital Mental Health in Nursing Practice: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Shift from Efficacy to Implementation Science (2020-2026)

  • Shoukai Yu; 
  • Lingmei Qian; 
  • Hao Wu

ABSTRACT

Background:

Nurses are pivotal as end-users and implementers of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs). However, the successful translation of efficacious DMHIs into sustainable nursing practice is hindered by multifaceted implementation challenges.

Objective:

This study aimed to systematically map and analyze the evolving research landscape of nurse-involved DMHIs to determine if a paradigm shift from efficacy testing to implementation science is occurring, and to characterize the methodological and thematic trends associated with this shift.

Methods:

We conducted a scoping review integrated with bibliometric analysis, following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. A comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection (2020-2024) yielded 496 eligible primary research studies. Studies were classified as “efficacy/effectiveness” or “implementation” research using a validated framework. We analyzed temporal trends, methodological designs, and performed co-word thematic mapping.

Results:

Implementation research constituted 41.3% of the literature, surpassing efficacy/effectiveness research (35.9%). A significant annual increase in the proportion of implementation studies was observed (β=2.8%, P=0.018). Methodologically, implementation studies employed significantly more mixed-methods (25% vs 8%, P<0.001) and qualitative designs (20% vs 2%, P<0.001) compared to efficacy studies. Thematic analysis revealed “nursing workflow integration,” “task-shifting,” and “nurse-led implementation” as key, emerging motor themes with high centrality and density.

Conclusions:

This review provides robust empirical evidence of a decisive “implementation turn” in nursing digital mental health research. The field is moving beyond a primary focus on internal validity to actively investigate the determinants of successful real-world integration. To accelerate the effective adoption of DMHIs, future efforts must focus on developing implementation-ready digital tools, embedding implementation science competencies into nursing education, and designing pragmatic studies that address nurse-identified barriers.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yu S, Qian L, Wu H

The Shift From Efficacy to Implementation Science (2020-2026) in Nursing Practice for Digital Mental Health: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e91498

DOI: 10.2196/91498

PMID: 42418354

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.