Currently accepted at: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2026
Date Accepted: Aug 4, 2026
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/91245
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Effect of a Mobile App Intervention Amamantapp on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Human Milk Donation in Breastfeeding Women in Lima, Peru: Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Breastfeeding in preterm infants is disrupted by several factors, thus requiring donated breast milk. Although human milk banks (HMB) become allies in reducing premature infant mortality, the number of donors is insufficient to meet the demand due to knowledge, individual, and sociocultural barriers, among others, that influence the willingness to donate. Mobile health apps can help address some of these barriers. However, few apps have been properly tested. We developed and evaluated a mobile app to promote human milk donation among breastfeeding women.
Objective:
This paper aimed to determine the effect of a mobile app, AmamantApp, on knowledge, attitudes, and practices of human milk donation among breastfeeding women in Lima, Peru.
Methods:
A mixed methods study design was conducted. The quantitative component included a randomized controlled trial involving 112 breastfeeding mothers enrolled in a mother and child hospital. The intervention group (n=54) received education on human milk donation via a mobile app, and the control group (n=58) received printed educational material. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) were assessed with a KAP questionnaire before and after the 60-day intervention. The development of the mobile intervention was based on the Human Centered Design approach. Additionally, the qualitative component based on a phenomenological design was conducted through 17 in-depth interviews and one focus group to explore individual, social, and systemic barriers to the practice of human milk donation.
Results:
This study found no differences in sociodemographic characteristics between breastfeeding mothers in the intervention and control groups. A total of 78 mothers completed the study (n=37 in the intervention group; n=41 in the control group). The analyses revealed significant differences between the groups in knowledge scores (MD [mean difference]: 0.94 points, P=.04). No differences were observed in attitudes or practices towards human milk donation. Qualitative findings highlighted individual barriers, specifically a lack of time and social barriers related to working conditions. Systemic barriers were also identified, including the cost of laboratory tests required for donors, the limited number of collection points and HMB, and limited information, follow-up and motivation on human milk donation by health staff.
Conclusions:
AmamantApp improved knowledge about human milk donation among breastfeeding women participants. Individual, social, and systemic barriers were identified that limited this practice in the intervention group, which could be addressed to encourage donation practices. The use of technological resources such as AmamantApp has great potential to positively influence the promotion of favorable attitudes towards human milk donation. Accordingly, it is suggested that decision-makers in the health sector incorporate it into the planning and implementation of educational activities aimed at promoting human milk donation.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.