Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Jan 12, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 15, 2026 - Mar 12, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Conceptual Model for Ambient AI Adoption: Perspectives from Academia and Industry
ABSTRACT
Ambient AI technologies are increasingly marketed as solutions to reduce clinician burden and improve care efficiency, yet real-world performance varies widely across clinical settings. Healthcare provider organizations face challenges in determining which aspects of ambient AI performance matter most and how to obtain meaningful information about those aspects from vendors or through internal evaluation. This article presents a shared mental model to guide health system leaders in conceptualizing ambient AI performance across three interdependent dimensions: technical, interface, and system-level. For each dimension, we outline the types of information relevant to assessment, what vendors should reasonably be expected to provide, and how healthcare provider organizations can conduct their own evaluations to contextualize, verify, or supplement vendor claims. By integrating both vendor and health-system perspectives, this work offers a grounded, practical structure to support organizations of all sizes in understanding and making informed decisions about ambient AI technologies.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.