Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Jan 6, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 25, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The 4 Ss Framework – Designing Age-Friendly Communities of the Future: A Focus Group Study

  • Inga Hunter; 
  • Caroline Lockhart

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital technology is increasingly being used to deliver interventions and initiatives to support the wellbeing of older adults. However, few studies have conducted needs assessments to identify the future wellbeing service requirements of an older adult population and their preferred modes of delivery, whether via digital technology or in-person, or a combination of both (ie, a hybrid model).

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the requirements of a rural region in New Zealand to inform planning to meet the future wellbeing needs of its older adult population over the next 30 years

Methods:

In total, two focus group discussions and 10 interviews were held with participants using a combination of phone and video. A total of 33 adults aged ≥57 years participated. The participants were asked how they saw the future wellbeing needs of the older adult population evolving, the role of digital technology and/or in-person interactions to deliver wellbeing services, and perceived barriers to, and enablers of, digital technology for providing services. Focus group and interview transcripts were thematically analysed.

Results:

A total of 4 key wellbeing themes were identified across both focus group discussions and interviews with participants: “skills”, “services”, “spaces” and “social connection.” Each theme reflects the older adults’ interview responses in relation to questions about their demographic details and level of technology confidence.

Conclusions:

Results indicated that, within this rural regional population, older adults had limited understanding of, and low confidence in using digital technology. Although 57% of participants initially self-reported being very or somewhat confident using technology, most were unable to successfully engage in online focus groups. Meanwhile, digital technology is developing at a rapid pace, and as a result, we need to consider how to plan for the transition and bridge the gap identified between the current use of digital technology and its potential future use if technology is to support the older adults of the future. The findings indicate that older adults prefer to engage in-person, while trust is a barrier to digital technology use for some participants. The future offers many opportunities to support the wellbeing of individuals and communities through the application of the proposed 4 Ss Framework. Clinical Trial: N/A.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hunter I, Lockhart C

The 4 Ss Framework – Designing Age-Friendly Communities of the Future: A Focus Group Study

JMIR Preprints. 06/01/2026:90923

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.90923

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90923

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.