Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Infodemiology

Date Submitted: Jan 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 19, 2026 - Mar 16, 2026
Date Accepted: Jul 8, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/90888

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Distortions, Fabrications, and Manipulations: An Annotated Profile of Fact-checked COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic

  • Heba Shaaban; 
  • Salma Ramadan; 
  • Iman Mousselli; 
  • Eissa Al Nashmi; 
  • David Scales

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to a global “infodemic” in which social media platforms amplified misinformation. Despite high social media adoption rates and heavy reliance on social media for pandemic news in Arab-speaking countries, relatively little is known about the prevalence and characteristics of online Arabic COVID-19 misinformation.

Objective:

To capture and analyze a snapshot of the COVID-19 misinformation ecosystem in Arabic, identifying characteristics and patterns to guide future research and interventions of particular benefit to this linguistic region.

Methods:

We compiled a database of 234 COVID-19 misinformation claims published online from March 2020 to March 2022, sourced from four International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)-certified Arabic fact-checking organizations. Claims were coded inductively and deductively with high inter-rater reliability, to determine misinformation type (κ = 0.88), narrative typology (κ = 0.913), framing strategies (κ = 0.72), medical jargon usage (κ = 0.794), and societal implications (κ = 0.752). All Cohen's kappa coefficients were significant at p < 0.001.

Results:

Facebook was the most popular platform, followed by Twitter, with regular users being the primary source of debunked claims. The most prevalent narrative typologies were COVID-19 biological aspects (origins, existence, diagnosis, prevention, transmission, and cures) (47.2%) and vaccines (30%). Fabricated/manipulated (54.9%), followed by misleading content (36.9%), were the most common misinformation types. The most frequent framing strategy involved distortion of science and medicine (29.6%), followed by entertainment/satire (23.6%), political content (18.9%), and conspiracies (13.3%). Notably, 36.3% of claims were translated from English, and only 50% of the analyzed content was moderated by the original platforms.

Conclusions:

Fact-checked Arabic COVID-19 misinformation exhibited distinct patterns, including heavy reliance on translated content, manipulated content, and scientific distortion as a credibility strategy, and significant gaps in platform moderation. These findings highlight the need for enhanced Arabic-language content moderation, cross-linguistic fact-checking collaboration, culturally appropriate media and health literacy interventions, and rebuilding institutional trust to address misinformation in the Arab-world effectively. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shaaban H, Ramadan S, Mousselli I, Al Nashmi E, Scales D

Distortions, Fabrications, and Manipulations: An Annotated Profile of Fact-checked COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic

JMIR Infodemiology. 08/07/2026:90888 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/90888

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90888

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.