Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Infodemiology

Date Submitted: Jan 5, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 19, 2026 - Mar 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Distortions, Fabrications, and Manipulations: An Annotated Profile of Fact-checked COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic

  • Heba Shaaban; 
  • Salma Ramadan; 
  • Iman Mousselli; 
  • Eissa Al Nashmi; 
  • David Scales

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to a global “infodemic” in which social media platforms amplified misinformation. Despite high social media adoption rates and heavy reliance on social media for pandemic news in Arab-speaking countries, relatively little is known about the prevalence and characteristics of online Arabic COVID-19 misinformation.

Objective:

To capture and analyze a snapshot of the COVID-19 misinformation ecosystem in Arabic, identifying characteristics and patterns to guide future research and interventions of particular benefit to this linguistic region.

Methods:

We compiled a database of 234 COVID-19 misinformation claims published online from March 2020 to March 2022, sourced from four International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN)-certified Arabic fact-checking organizations. Claims were coded inductively and deductively with high inter-rater reliability, to determine misinformation type (κ = 0.88), narrative typology (κ = 0.913), framing strategies (κ = 0.72), medical jargon usage (κ = 0.794), and societal implications (κ = 0.752). All Cohen's kappa coefficients were significant at p < 0.001.

Results:

Facebook was the most popular platform, followed by Twitter, with regular users being the primary source of debunked claims. The most prevalent narrative typologies were COVID-19 biological aspects (origins, existence, diagnosis, prevention, transmission, and cures) (47.2%) and vaccines (30%). Fabricated/manipulated (54.9%), followed by misleading content (36.9%), were the most common misinformation types. The most frequent framing strategy involved distortion of science and medicine (29.6%), followed by entertainment/satire (23.6%), political content (18.9%), and conspiracies (13.3%). Notably, 36.3% of claims were translated from English, and only 50% of the analyzed content was moderated by the original platforms.

Conclusions:

Fact-checked Arabic COVID-19 misinformation exhibited distinct patterns, including heavy reliance on translated content, manipulated content, and scientific distortion as a credibility strategy, and significant gaps in platform moderation. These findings highlight the need for enhanced Arabic-language content moderation, cross-linguistic fact-checking collaboration, culturally appropriate media and health literacy interventions, and rebuilding institutional trust to address misinformation in the Arab-world effectively. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shaaban H, Ramadan S, Mousselli I, Al Nashmi E, Scales D

Distortions, Fabrications, and Manipulations: An Annotated Profile of Fact-checked COVID-19 Misinformation in Arabic

JMIR Preprints. 05/01/2026:90888

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.90888

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90888

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.