Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (no longer under consideration since Jan 02, 2026)

Date Submitted: Jan 1, 2026

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Quality and Accessibility of Neonatal Pneumonia-Related Short Videos on Major Social Media Platforms: A Cross-Sectional Content Analysis

  • 增蕊 汪; 
  • 壮 罗; 
  • 乐 王; 
  • 杰夫 唐; 
  • 智 张; 
  • 鑫丽 范

ABSTRACT

Background:

Abstract Objective To evaluate the quality, accuracy, and accessibility of neonatal pneumonia-related health science short videos on TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai, and to optimize neonatal health communication strategies. Methods A total of 298 eligible videos were collected. Two researchers assessed quality using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN. Descriptive statistics, Cohen's kappa coefficient, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for analysis. Results Inter-rater reliability was good (κ=0.82 and 0.78). Professional medical personnel/institutions uploaded 41.3% of videos, with significantly higher quality scores than non-professionals (P<0.001). Key information coverage was uneven: 82.2% covered clinical manifestations, but only 31.5% mentioned treatment and 27.8% prevention. TikTok had the highest views but lower quality than Bilibili (P<0.05). Conclusions Neonatal pneumonia short videos show uneven quality with insufficient therapeutic/preventive information. Professional institutions and platform content review mechanisms are needed to improve quality, helping caregivers obtain reliable health information.

Objective:

To evaluate the quality, accuracy, and accessibility of neonatal pneumonia-related health science short videos on TikTok, Bilibili, and Kwai, and to optimize neonatal health communication strategies.

Methods:

A total of 298 eligible videos were collected. Two researchers assessed quality using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN. Descriptive statistics, Cohen's kappa coefficient, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used for analysis.

Results:

Inter-rater reliability was good (κ=0.82 and 0.78). Professional medical personnel/institutions uploaded 41.3% of videos, with significantly higher quality scores than non-professionals (P<0.001). Key information coverage was uneven: 82.2% covered clinical manifestations, but only 31.5% mentioned treatment and 27.8% prevention. TikTok had the highest views but lower quality than Bilibili (P<0.05).

Conclusions:

Neonatal pneumonia short videos show uneven quality with insufficient therapeutic/preventive information. Professional institutions and platform content review mechanisms are needed to improve quality, helping caregivers obtain reliable health information.


 Citation

Please cite as:

汪 å, 罗 å, 王 ä, 唐 æ, 张 æ, 范 é

Quality and Accessibility of Neonatal Pneumonia-Related Short Videos on Major Social Media Platforms: A Cross-Sectional Content Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 01/01/2026:90661

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.90661

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90661

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.