Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Dec 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Development, validation and algorithmic fairness of traditional statistical and machine learning models for dementia risk: a population-based cohort study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Machine learning is increasingly used in dementia risk prediction models, but their clinical utility and algorithmic fairness remain uncertain.
Objective:
This study aimed to develop and validate traditional statistical and machine learning models for dementia risk prediction in the general population and to evaluate their fairness across key subgroups.
Methods:
This population-based cohort study followed 483,824 UK Biobank participants without dementia for up to 13 years. Five models for all-cause dementia were developed using 56 evidence-based predictors: Cox proportional hazards model (Cox-PH), competing event risk model (CR), logistic regression (LR), XGBoost, and LightGBM. An age-only model was also developed for comparison. Model performance was assessed at various risk-stratified thresholds, and algorithmic fairness was evaluated through subgroup analysis.
Results:
During follow-up, 7,087 participants (1.46%) developed dementia. All models showed similar discrimination (C-index: 0.85-0.90). Although traditional statistical models (Cox-PH, CR, and LR) had lower C-indices than XGBoost and LightGBM in the internal validation cohort (C-index: 0.85-0.86 vs. 0.87-0.90), their performance in the external validation cohort was similar (C-index: 0.86-0.87 vs. 0.87). With 20% of the screening population identified as high-risk, detection rates ranged from 74% to 76%, with positive predictive values (PPV) of 5%, while the age-only model achieved 68% detection with PPV of 4% externally. The C index decreased to 0.59-0.70 in those aged over 70 years.
Conclusions:
Traditional statistical and machine learning models had comparable performance in predicting dementia risk within the general population. However, all models showed limited ability to predict high-risk individuals, especially in older populations, indicating limited clinical utility.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.