Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Dec 23, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 23, 2025 - Feb 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Medical Faculty Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Integration in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study from the United Arab Emirates

  • Azhar Rahma; 
  • Uffaira Hafeez; 
  • Susan Waller; 
  • Munawar Farooq

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare, creating an imperative to integrate AI into medical education. While student perspectives are well-studied, faculty views, particularly in non-Western contexts, remain underexplored.

Objective:

Objective This study examines medical faculty perspectives on AI integration in undergraduate medical education within the United Arab Emirates (UAE), focusing on pedagogical applications, implementation challenges, and context-specific considerations.

Methods:

Methods This multi-institutional qualitative study employed purposive and reflexive sampling to recruit faculty from both public and private medical universities in the UAE. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten faculty members involved in curriculum design, teaching, or assessment. Data collection followed COREQ guidelines, with analysis using a mixed inductive-deductive approach guided by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Findings were organized and interpreted through the FACETS (Form, AI Use Case, Context, Education, Technology, SAMR) framework and SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) model.

Results:

Results Analysis revealed six key themes aligned with the FACETS framework. Faculty primarily used Natural Language Processing tools (Form) for assessment generation and personalized learning (AI Use Case). Integration spanned preclinical and clinical settings, with strong emphasis on cultural and ethical localization for the UAE context (Context). AI enhanced assessment alignment and teaching efficiency (Education) through accessible, general-purpose tools (Technology). SAMR analysis indicated current use predominantly at Substitution and Augmentation levels, with emerging recognition of Redefinition potential. Faculty identified urgent needs for professional development and concerns about equity and overreliance.

Conclusions:

Conclusion UAE medical faculty demonstrate cautious optimism toward AI integration, recognizing its potential to enhance educational efficiency and personalization while emphasizing the critical importance of cultural contextualization. Current implementation remains at early adoption stages, focused on enhancement rather than transformation. Successful integration requires faculty development, context-sensitive policies, and equitable implementation strategies that address both technological and socio-cultural dimensions of AI adoption in medical education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rahma A, Hafeez U, Waller S, Farooq M

Medical Faculty Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Integration in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Qualitative Study from the United Arab Emirates

JMIR Preprints. 23/12/2025:90192

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.90192

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90192

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.