Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance

Date Submitted: Dec 20, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 22, 2025 - Feb 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Natural Experiment Reveals the Post-Pandemic Shifts in Population-Level Infectious Disease-Specific Health Literacy: Six-Round Cross-Sectional Survey Study

  • Zhao Yusui; 
  • Dingming Yao; 
  • Yue Xu; 
  • Xiujing Hu; 
  • Qingqing Wu; 
  • Lei Wang; 
  • Xuehai Zhang; 
  • Zhen Jiang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic, with its unprecedented global scale and intensive public health interventions, functioned as a unique, large-scale "natural experiment" in population health education. It remains unclear whether this event led to sustained, broad improvements in public literacy regarding infectious diseases beyond COVID-19 itself.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal trends in infectious disease-specific health literacy (IDSHL) among residents of Zhejiang Province, China, from 2019 (pre-pandemic) to 2024 (post-pandemic), to assess the lasting impact of this "natural experiment."

Methods:

Six annual cross-sectional surveys were conducted from 2019 to 2024 across 30 counties in Zhejiang Province, using consistent multistage stratified random sampling and a validated 12-item IDSHL questionnaire assessing knowledge, behavior, and skills. Annual sample sizes ranged from 17,131 to 19,257 (total N=112,917). Joinpoint regression and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze trends and identify associations.

Results:

Population-weighted overall IDSHL scores increased significantly from 2019 (mean=10.46, SD=3.09) to 2024 (mean=11.40, SD=2.88) (P<.001). All subscale scores (knowledge, behavior, skills) showed significant upward trends (all P<.001). Joinpoint regression revealed the most rapid annual increase in the proportion of residents with adequate IDSHL occurred during the acute pandemic phase (2019-2021: APC=9.42%, P<.001), which slowed significantly post-2021 (2021-2024: APC=2.28%, P=.074). Correct response rates surged for items directly related to pandemic messaging (e.g., respiratory etiquette increased from 28.44% to 39.67%), but knowledge on non-respiratory diseases like hepatitis B fluctuated without a clear sustained gain. Adjusted analysis, using 2021 as the reference year, confirmed the lowest odds of adequate IDSHL in 2019 (OR=0.741) and the highest in 2024 (OR=1.098).

Conclusions:

The COVID-19 pandemic served as a potent natural experiment, catalyzing a significant and sustained improvement in population-level IDSHL, particularly in pandemic-relevant knowledge and behaviors. However, the effect was time-sensitive, with accelerated gains during the acute crisis decelerating afterward, and was not uniform across all disease domains or demographic groups. Post-pandemic health strategies must reinforce comprehensive IDSHL through sustained education and address the digital information landscape to bridge persistent equity gaps.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yusui Z, Yao D, Xu Y, Hu X, Wu Q, Wang L, Zhang X, Jiang Z

A Natural Experiment Reveals the Post-Pandemic Shifts in Population-Level Infectious Disease-Specific Health Literacy: Six-Round Cross-Sectional Survey Study

JMIR Preprints. 20/12/2025:89958

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.89958

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/89958

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.