Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Dec 18, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 8, 2026 - Mar 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Developing Digital Platforms to Help Older People Stay Physically and Socially Active Produced Through Codesign: Toolkit Production and Impact
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital technologies have the potential to support physical, cognitive, and social activity among older adults, but many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) lack the resources to conduct meaningful codesign with end-users. Toolkits derived from rigorous codesign processes may offer a scalable mechanism for translating end-user priorities into real-world product development.
Objective:
This study aimed to (1) engage older adults in an extensive codesign process to identify priorities for digital technologies that support physical activity and reminiscence, (2) translate these findings into a practical developer-facing toolkit, and (3) evaluate the toolkit’s perceived utility and influence among digital technology SMEs.
Methods:
157 participants (120 older, 7 younger, and 30 staff) across 15 community and care settings in England and Scotland engaged in 106 technology interaction sessions, 22 evaluation focus groups and 10 codesign workshops involving more than 20 digital technologies. Thematic analysis and structured card-ranking tasks were used to derive end-user priorities. Preliminary toolkits were created and provided to 10 UK-based SMEs who received small grants to apply the toolkit to active development projects. Developer reports and follow-up interviews were analysed thematically to identify perceived impacts on design decisions, product adaptations, and business outcomes.
Results:
Codesign activities generated seven cross-cutting themes: motivation, content, barriers, design and inclusivity, suitability, acceptability, and motivations to use. These were organised into three toolkit sections: general design principles, online physical-activity platforms, and virtual reality. Developers reported that the toolkits enhanced understanding of older adults’ needs, validated design decisions, and inspired new features. Reported impacts included improved usability, expanded accessibility options, increased content variety, clearer instructional design, enhanced social components, and reduced operational costs. SMEs also reported business benefits, including strengthened cases for investment and increased product uptake.
Conclusions:
Codesign-derived toolkits offer a scalable and cost-effective mechanism for translating older adults’ priorities into digital product development. SMEs perceived the toolkit as practical, relevant, and impactful for informing design choices. This approach complements, but does not replace, direct user involvement and may help accelerate inclusive digital-health innovation for ageing populations. Clinical Trial: n/a
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.