Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Dec 16, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 6, 2026 - Mar 3, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Feasibility and Engagement Patterns of an LLM-Enabled Mental Health Voice- and Chatbot: Exploratory 4- and 8-Week Naturalistic Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Baseline data from our survey of 527 self-referred users of the mental health chat- and voice bot Clare® indicate high psychological distress and barriers to accessing face-to-face care strong working alliance was established within 3–5 days (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Report, M = 3.76, SD = .72). The feasibility of sustained engagement and therapeutic bonding with Clare® in real-world use remains underexplored.
Objective:
This exploratory feasibility study evaluated engagement patterns, sustained therapeutic bonding, and preliminary mental health outcomes during 4- and 8-week use of the LLM-enabled voice and text chatbot Clare®.
Methods:
A single-group pre-post feasibility study was conducted with the English-speaking general population that self-referred and interacted with the voice- and chatbot Clare® for 4 weeks (n=53) or 8 weeks (n=21). Usage patterns, modes of engagement (hybrid, text-only, call-only), message volume, and call duration were examined. Users were further assessed for working alliance and changes in loneliness, depression, anxiety, distress, and life satisfaction at baseline, week 4 (t1), and week 8 (t2).
Results:
A total of 53 participants (73.6% women) engaged with the Clare® over 4 weeks (sample 1) and 21 participants (71.4% women) completed all assessments (sample 2), with both samples showing comparable demographic profiles. At baseline, participants reported moderate depression and anxiety, elevated social anxiety and high loneliness. Initial engagement peaked in the first week, with participants initiating an average of 1.77 calls and sending 10.02 messages, before declining steadily. On average participants initiated an average of 3.34 calls, sent 23.65 messages, and spent a total of 8.07 minutes in voice calls in 4 weeks. A comparable pattern was observed in the 8-week completer sample (n = 21). Working alliance increased over time, rising from 2.91 (SD 0.88) at baseline to 3.21 (SD 1.17) at mid-assessment and 3.34 (SD 1.03) at post-assessment (t3). There was no significant association with engagement intensity. Higher baseline distress was associated with fewer messages and lower alliance. Higher depressive symptoms were linked to fewer early calls and lower overall call frequency. Modest improvements were observed across loneliness, depression, anxiety, and distress. This was a feasibility study with substantial attrition and results should be interpreted with caution.
Conclusions:
Clare® appears feasible and acceptable for short-term community use, with early and stable bonding and preliminary signals of emotional and mental-health improvement. Declining engagement over time and the weak association between communication volume and alliance highlight the need for technology improvement and individualized symptom-oriented design strategies that support sustained and meaningful interaction.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.