Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 11, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 11, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A Mobile Health Platform for Heart Failure Self-management: Feasibility Study on Patient Engagement, Acceptance and Potential Health Outcomes

  • Jane Li; 
  • Marlien Varnfield; 
  • Andrew A Bayor; 
  • Norm Good; 
  • Haunnah Rheault; 
  • Estelle Beevors; 
  • Kathryn Stibijl; 
  • Maricel Roxas; 
  • Scott McKenzie

ABSTRACT

Background:

Heart failure is a chronic condition which significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and increases healthcare burden. Effective self-monitoring and lifestyle modifications are essential components of management and improving health outcomes. Mobile health technologies, such as smartphone apps, are being used more widely to assist heart failure patients with self-management. However, evidence regarding patient engagement, user experience, and the effectiveness of these mobile health tools remains limited and continues to evolve.

Objective:

Our research aimed to explore the feasibility of a mobile health platform, MoTER-HF, which incorporates a smartphone app and a web-based clinical portal to support self-management in heart failure patients.

Methods:

The feasibility study utilized a single-group pretest-posttest mixed-methods design. A total of 23 participants diagnosed with heart failure were recruited to use the app and two Bluetooth-enabled devices (a blood pressure monitor and a digital weight scale) over a 12-week period. Patients’ engagement and acceptance were assessed using a satisfaction questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and platform usage logs. Health and behavior outcomes were measured at baseline and at week 12 using validated instruments.

Results:

Most participants found the MoTER-HF app easy to use and aligned with their daily health monitoring routines. The frequency of use for features such as tracking blood pressure and weight daily was high. However, features such as self-reported symptom tracking and recording exercises in the app were used less frequently, reflecting individual preferences and perceived relevance. While no statistically significant changes in health and behaviour outcome were observed, trends indicated modest improvements in self-care, quality of life, and psychological well-being. Participants reported improved self-monitoring practices and valued the ability to visualize and track their data as well as the reassurance provided through nurses’ oversight.

Conclusions:

The MoTER-HF platform has demonstrated potential in supporting self-management among individuals with heart failure, particularly when it incorporates features that participants find engaging. Further research is needed to better understand the platform’s impact on health outcomes and to involve clinicians in developing a scalable digital model of care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Li J, Varnfield M, Bayor AA, Good N, Rheault H, Beevors E, Stibijl K, Roxas M, McKenzie S

A Mobile Health Platform for Heart Failure Self-management: Feasibility Study on Patient Engagement, Acceptance and Potential Health Outcomes

JMIR Preprints. 11/12/2025:89416

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.89416

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/89416

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.