Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Dec 3, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 6, 2025 - Jan 31, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Haptic Virtual Reality Simulators in Preclinical Prosthodontic Crown Preparation: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

  • Nabil Odisho; 
  • Ara Simonian; 
  • Rita Chamoun; 
  • Maria Christidis; 
  • Giancarlo de la Torre Canales; 
  • Abhishek Kumar; 
  • Anastasios Grigoriadis

ABSTRACT

Background:

Crown preparation is a technically demanding psychomotor skill in undergraduate dental education. While traditional typodont training is the gold standard, it is resource-intensive and is difficult to individualize. Haptic Virtual Reality Simulation (HVRS) offers a sustainable pedagogical alternative, but its efficacy in transferring skills to the physical environment remains a subject of critical investigation.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate whether short-term training on the HVRS improves crown preparation performance on typodont teeth, and to examine manual dexterity and self-confidence outcomes.

Methods:

The study was conducted with 44 fifth-semester dental students at Karolinska Institutet, allocated to a simulator group (SIM; n = 22) or a control group (n = 22). The SIM group completed three hours of haptic virtual reality simulator (HVRS) training over one week, while the control group received no simulator exposure. Both groups prepared a maxillary first molar for a monolithic zirconia crown on a phantom head. Crown preparation quality was assessed using PrepCheck® and a blinded examiner. Manual dexterity was measured using the Grooved Pegboard Test (GPT), and self-confidence and simulator perceptions were evaluated through surveys.

Results:

The SIM group achieved a higher mean total preparation score than the control group (11.91 vs. 10.91), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.235). Significantly better scores were observed in Total Occlusal Convergence (TOC) angle for the SIM group (p = 0.04). Manual dexterity improved in both groups, but the control group remained significantly faster at baseline and post-intervention (p = 0.044 and p = 0.001). While overall self-confidence levels were comparable, the SIM group reported fewer instances of "very low" confidence (5%) compared to the Control group (18%). Participants perceived the simulator’s tactile realism as low, though they valued its ability to demonstrate procedural workflows.

Conclusions:

Three hours of self-directed HVRS training do not significantly improve overall crown preparation quality or general self-confidence, but improve performance in TOC angle for crown preparations. HVRS may serve as an effective "Partial Task Trainer" within a blended curriculum.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Odisho N, Simonian A, Chamoun R, Christidis M, Canales GdlT, Kumar A, Grigoriadis A

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Haptic Virtual Reality Simulators in Preclinical Prosthodontic Crown Preparation: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 03/12/2025:88916

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.88916

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/88916

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.