Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 11, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026
Date Accepted: Apr 7, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Prevalence of Work-Related Pain or Discomfort Among Urologists in the State of Florida: Results From the Florida Urologic Society Task Force on Ergonomic Challenges Experienced by Its Members

David J, Hill A, Schommer J, Regele E, Ball C, Punnen S, Costa J, Ball A, Brahmbhatt J, Thiel D, Pak R, Pathak RA

Prevalence of Work-Related Pain or Discomfort Among Urologists in the State of Florida: Results From the Florida Urologic Society Task Force on Ergonomic Challenges Experienced by Its Members

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e88848

DOI: 10.2196/88848

PMID: 42308480

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Prevalence of Work-related Pain/Discomfort Among Urologists in the State of Florida: Results from the Florida Urologic Society Task Force (FUSTF) on Ergonomic Challenges Experienced by its Members

  • Justin David; 
  • Austin Hill; 
  • Jared Schommer; 
  • Eric Regele; 
  • Colleen Ball; 
  • Sanoj Punnen; 
  • Joseph Costa; 
  • Adam Ball; 
  • Jamin Brahmbhatt; 
  • David Thiel; 
  • Raymond Pak; 
  • Ram A Pathak

ABSTRACT

Background:

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMRDs) are very prevalent among urologists. Understanding factors associated with increased work pain can help mitigate this discomfort and decrease burnout.

Objective:

To quantify the number of Urologists who reported WRMDs > 25% of the time.

Methods:

The Florida Urological Society Task Force (FUSTF) developed a survey based on the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire with additional input from Cornell ergonomic studies. MCSRC conducted and distributed the survey to 504 members of the Florida Urological Society in 2023.

Results:

The total response rate was 18.6%. The primary outcome (number of urologists who reported pain > 25% of the time) was 45.3%. 32.4% reported pain associated >25% of the time with endoscopic surgery, 40.0% for major open cases, 20.6% for minor open cases, and 22.7% for robotic cases. 68.8% of respondents attributed their work-related pain to uncomfortable operating positions. 29.9% of respondents chose to ignore their pain.

Conclusions:

The total response rate was 18.6%. The primary outcome (number of urologists who reported pain > 25% of the time) was 45.3%. 32.4% reported pain associated >25% of the time with endoscopic surgery, 40.0% for major open cases, 20.6% for minor open cases, and 22.7% for robotic cases. 68.8% of respondents attributed their work-related pain to uncomfortable operating positions. 29.9% of respondents chose to ignore their pain. Clinical Trial: n/a


 Citation

Please cite as:

David J, Hill A, Schommer J, Regele E, Ball C, Punnen S, Costa J, Ball A, Brahmbhatt J, Thiel D, Pak R, Pathak RA

Prevalence of Work-Related Pain or Discomfort Among Urologists in the State of Florida: Results From the Florida Urologic Society Task Force on Ergonomic Challenges Experienced by Its Members

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e88848

DOI: 10.2196/88848

PMID: 42308480

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.