Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 4, 2025 - Jan 29, 2026
Date Accepted: Feb 26, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/88778

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Bridging the Implementation Gap in Medical AI Education: A Three-Lever Framework for Concurrent Reform

  • Sherrie L Kelly; 
  • Melissa Forgie; 
  • Mark C Walker

ABSTRACT

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice necessitates urgent restructuring of medical education and physician assessment to ensure future doctors are proficient and responsible users of AI tools. Despite the existence of core AI competencies, the current state of AI education within Canadian Undergraduate Medical Education (UGME) is highly inconsistent and disjointed, and available data indicate that most medical students receive minimal to no formal AI training even as they anticipate AI profoundly shaping their future careers. National policy, specifically the Pan-Canadian AI for Health (AI4H) Guiding Principles, has advanced the agenda by calling for AI literacy among health professionals and emphasizing core values such as equity, robust data practices, and Indigenous-led data governance. However, these principles offer limited practical guidance on the educational and regulatory mechanisms required for effective implementation. We contend that this critical implementation deficit arises from a traditional, sequential reform model in which faculty development, curriculum change, and regulatory updates occur in isolation. This slow, siloed approach is fundamentally inadequate for addressing AI’s inherent speed, opacity, and significant equity risks. To overcome this, we propose a three-lever concurrent implementation framework. This model posits that AI competencies transition from abstract requirements to practical application only when three levers—clinician-educator capacity, digitally enabled learning environments, and regulatory and assessment reform—are activated simultaneously and in alignment. This Viewpoint extends existing AI competency frameworks by theorizing AI curriculum implementation as a problem of concurrent lever activation and by outlining minimum concurrent actions for deans and regulators that can be adapted to competency-based medical education systems. Although illustrated with Canadian examples, the framework is designed to be transferable beyond Canada and offers a testable, licensure-level blueprint for embedding AI competence in medical education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kelly SL, Forgie M, Walker MC

Bridging the Implementation Gap in Medical AI Education: A Three-Lever Framework for Concurrent Reform

JMIR Medical Education. 26/02/2026:88778 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/88778

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/88778

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.