Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 19, 2026

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/88703

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Efficacy of pedagogical approaches in promoting hepatitis C knowledge and self-efficacy among men living with HIV: A randomized controlled trial

  • Yi-Ting Chen; 
  • Guan-Jhou Chen; 
  • Hsin-Yun Sun; 
  • Wang-Da Liu; 
  • Yu-Shan Huang; 
  • Kuan-Yin Lin; 
  • Tzong-Yow Wu; 
  • Chien-Ching Hung; 
  • Su-Fen Cheng

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission rates are high among men who have sex with men (MSM) living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a group with low awareness and limited skills in HCV prevention. However, few educational interventions are specifically designed for this population.

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital educational interventions on HCV prevention knowledge and self-efficacy among MSM living with HIV.

Methods:

PWH who are MSM were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive three different HCV educational modalities using serious game interventions (SG), web browsing (WB), or verbal/printed pamphlet (VP). The participants underwent a uniformed questionnaire interview to assess their knowledge and self-efficacy in preventing HCV infection at pre-intervention. The evaluations were repeated 1-week post-intervention and 12-week follow-up after randomization.

Results:

207 PWH were enrolled: 71, 67, and 69 in the SG, WB and VP groups, respectively. At pre-intervention, there were significant differences in the knowledge level among the three groups: 10.51 in SG group (95% CI, 9.60-11.41), 10.93 in WB group (95% CI, 10.16-11.69), and 11.83 in VP group (95% CI, 11.19-12.46) (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in self-efficacy among the three groups. Using GEE models to analyze the effects of different HCV education interventions at different observation points, only SG group were significantly associated with an increase of HCV knowledge score at 12-week follow-up (???? = 1.16, p = 0.02). Analysis of the difference-in-differences estimates also yield similar results.

Conclusions:

All three educational interventions improved HCV knowledge and self-efficacy, with the SG approach enhancing knowledge retention, implying the benefit of digital educational intervention. Clinical Trial: Approved by the National Taiwan University Hospital Research Ethics Committee (registration number: 202206084RIN). Registered on July 28, 2022, at National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05497388


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chen YT, Chen GJ, Sun HY, Liu WD, Huang YS, Lin KY, Wu TY, Hung CC, Cheng SF

Efficacy of pedagogical approaches in promoting hepatitis C knowledge and self-efficacy among men living with HIV: A randomized controlled trial

JMIR Preprints. 02/12/2025:88703

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.88703

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/88703

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.