Currently submitted to: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Nov 28, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 28, 2025 - Jan 23, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Ethical Tensions in Youth Mental Health Research
ABSTRACT
Mental health research increasingly pursues societal impact and addresses urgent challenges, which places researchers at the intersection of two powerful forces: the drive for innovation, and the imperative of ethical responsibility. Drawing on the NEON Young Norway Study, a research project co-developed with youth, clinical, and technology partners, this paper explores four ethical tensions in youth mental health research. Four tensions appear broadly relevant across contexts: (1) informational rigor vs. methodological flexibility; (2) formal ethical standards vs. youth-friendly communication; (3) safeguarding against harm vs. enabling youth participation; and (4) pseudonymization vs. authentic storytelling. These tensions create a significant gap between scholarly ethical frameworks and practical guidance for youth mental health research. We argue that responsible research must collaboratively develop and codify ethical norms in youth mental health research that shape and influence governance. Critically, ethics should function not as an innovation barrier but as a dynamic compass for responsible, inclusive, and impactful research. When ethical frameworks inadvertently exclude populations in vulnerable situations, knowledge gaps emerge that may perpetuate harm. Thus, ethical practice must actively enable safe and equitable inclusion, not merely prevent it.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.