Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Nov 27, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 27, 2025 - Jan 22, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
HerCare: Development and Formative Evaluation of a Dual-Source Retrieval-Augmented Generation Chatbot for Women’s Health
ABSTRACT
Background:
Conversational agents for women’s health often fail to meet user needs, offering either clinically sterile advice or unreliable peer anecdotes. This limitation creates a tension between the need for factual safety and emotional resonance in sensitive health contexts.
Objective:
We aimed to address this gap by developing and conducting a formative evaluation of HerCare, a conversational agent built on a novel dual-source Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture. The system systematically fuses expert medical knowledge with peer narratives to act as a “trust-calibration mechanism” through transparent source attribution.
Methods:
We conducted a remote, single-session field study with 243 participants to evaluate the system's usability, trustworthiness, and affective dynamics. Participants interacted with the agent regarding a women's health topic of personal interest. We employed a mixed-methods approach, combining standardized self-report metrics—the Chatbot Usability Questionnaire (CUQ) and Net Promoter Score (NPS)—with computational linguistic analyses (VADER sentiment analysis and NRC Emotion Lexicon) of 1,191 conversational turns.
Results:
Participants reported high system usability, with a mean CUQ score of 75.67 (SD 15.50). The system achieved a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of 60.0, indicating strong willingness to recommend the tool. In the Post-Interaction Questionnaire (5-point scale), participants rated Helpfulness (mean 4.55) and Trustworthiness (mean 4.35) highly. Computational analysis revealed a consistent conversational polarity shift: while user queries often skewed neutral-to-negative (compound scores down to -0.181), agent responses were consistently and strongly positive (compound scores +0.555 to +0.826). Emotion profiling identified a recurring “Validate, then Redirect” strategy, where the agent acknowledged distress (Sadness) before pivoting to a frame of Trust and Anticipation.
Conclusions:
The dual-source architecture successfully balanced clinical accuracy with emotional support, resulting in high perceived empathy and trust. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of weaving clinical sources with lived experiences to create safer, more resonant health AI, offering a transferable design pattern for future empathy-attuned systems.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.