Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Dec 1, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 22, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Viability of Virtual Reality for Children’s Food Choice Research: Comparative Mixed Methods Study

Aggarwal D, Hoang T, Russell CG, Tan SY, Mohebbi M

Evaluating the Viability of Virtual Reality for Children’s Food Choice Research: Comparative Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e88476

DOI: 10.2196/88476

PMID: 42390372

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the Viability of Virtual Reality for Children's Food Choice Research: Insights and Recommendations from a Comparative Mixed-Methods Study

  • Deepti Aggarwal; 
  • Thuong Hoang; 
  • Catherine Georgie Russell; 
  • Sze Yen Tan; 
  • Mohammadreza Mohebbi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual reality (VR) systems offer promising potential as a controlled platform to investigate human behaviours specifically related to food choices. Yet little is known about its viability to conduct food choice studies with children, thus limiting the development of public health research.

Objective:

This paper investigates the viability of VR technology to understand children's food choices, focusing specifically on perceptual differences between virtual reality and real-life (RL) settings. We examined how children perceive and interact with food portion sizes and container sizes in VR as compared to an equivalent RL scenario.

Methods:

A within-subjects, mixed-methods study was conducted with 437 children aged 5–12 years at a science museum. Participants engaged in a standardized food selection task for a simulated breakfast scenario, choosing portions of cereal and milk in two conditions: a head-mounted VR environment and a corresponding RL physical setup. Children's food selection behaviours were quantitatively compared across three independent variables: condition (VR vs. RL), food healthiness (healthy vs. unhealthy options), and container size (small, medium, and large). Qualitative and quantitative data were collected via post-session questionnaires assessing presence, embodiment, and simulator sickness, alongside detailed interaction logs from the VR environment. Data analysis utilized statistical comparisons and thematic analysis.

Results:

The findings revealed both behavioural consistency and significant perceptual differences between the VR and RL conditions. A behavioural similarity was identified, as children served significantly larger portions of unhealthy food compared to healthy food in both conditions. Crucially, a difference was observed in size perception: children struggled to accurately match the size of bowls and glasses between the VR and RL conditions. Furthermore, while children reported low feelings of presence and embodiment within the VR scenario, they demonstrated a high degree of control and engagement in the virtual task.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that current state-of-the-art VR technology presents limitations in its viability for conducting food choice studies with children, particularly concerning accurate size and volume perception. Based on the findings, we provide four practical recommendations to guide the future development of immersive food environments, thereby supporting more reliable and ecologically valid food choice research with young populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Aggarwal D, Hoang T, Russell CG, Tan SY, Mohebbi M

Evaluating the Viability of Virtual Reality for Children’s Food Choice Research: Comparative Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Hum Factors 2026;13:e88476

DOI: 10.2196/88476

PMID: 42390372

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.