Currently submitted to: JMIR Cardio
Date Submitted: Nov 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 25, 2025 - Jan 20, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
AI-STEMI : Can Artificial Intelligence outperforms Humans in Detecting Coronary Occlusions ?
ABSTRACT
Background:
Occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) on the ECG can present as STEMI, NSTEMI, ST depression, or other patterns (e.g., de Winter T-waves, hyperacute T waves), posing a diagnostic challenge. Even experienced physicians may overlook OMI on ECG, leading to delays in catheterization laboratory activation. Recently, smartphone applications utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) have been shown to exhibit a promising accuracy in ECG interpretation in large datasets.
Objective:
The objective of our study was to retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of an AI-based application (PMCardio®) with that of interventional cardiologists in interpreting non-pathognomonic ECGs that generated debates about diagnosis.
Methods:
In total, 33 ECGs that were diagnostically challenging upon patient admission to the emergency department were included. A group of 3 interventional cardiologists, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently assessed whether the ECG suggested OMI requiring immediate invasive coronary angiography. The diagnostic performance of the cardiologists was compared to that of the AI application, using the results of coronary angiography as the gold standard and considering any lesion with ≥90% stenosis as positive.
Results:
Overall, 29 (88%) patients had a final diagnosis of cardiac origin for their chest pain, including 23 acute coronary syndromes, of which 13 (57%) were OMI. The 3 cardiologists achieved sensitivities of 62%,85%,62%, negative predictive values of 74%,83%,69%, specificities of 70%, 50%, 55%, and positive predictive values of 57%52% and 47%, respectively. Their overall misclassification rates were 33%, 36% and 42%. In contrast, AI analysis demonstrated a sensitivity and NPV of 100%, a specificity of 60%, a PPV of 62%, and an overall misclassification rate of 24%.
Conclusions:
In this retrospective study of challenging ECGs, an AI application demonstrated better diagnostic performance of OMI as compared to cardiologists, underscoring its reliability for clinical use. These findings highlight the potential of AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.