Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Nov 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Adolescents’ Engagement With an mHealth Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (LIFE4YOUth): Mixed Methods and Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Seiterö A, Henriksson P, Thomas K, Löf M, Bendtsen M, Müssener U

Adolescents’ Engagement With an mHealth Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (LIFE4YOUth): Mixed Methods and Qualitative Comparative Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e88054

DOI: 10.2196/88054

PMID: 41818749

Adolescents’ Engagement with an mHealth Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (LIFE4YOUth): A Mixed-Methods and Qualitative Comparative Analysis

  • Anna Seiterö; 
  • Pontus Henriksson; 
  • Kristin Thomas; 
  • Marie Löf; 
  • Marcus Bendtsen; 
  • Ulrika Müssener

ABSTRACT

Background:

Behavior change interventions delivered through mobile phones often have low engagement among end-users.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore factors influencing engagement among Swedish high school students with access to LIFE4YOUth—a mobile-based multiple behavior change intervention targeting physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking. Special emphasis was placed on understanding low engagement.

Methods:

A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was employed. Quantitative usage data from 377 students were analyzed to describe engagement patterns. This was followed by qualitative data collection through 3 focus groups and 2 individual interviews (n = 20), analyzed using inductive content analysis. Finally, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to integrate findings and identify configurations of psychosocial and behavioral conditions associated with low engagement. The results from all phases were interpreted and discussed as a whole.

Results:

A majority (253/377, 67%) of participants showed low engagement, with 62% (157/253) never interacting with the intervention beyond receiving weekly text messages. Focus group discussions revealed 3 overarching categories influencing engagement: perceived importance of behavior change, user experiences, and environment of use. In total, 48% (121/253) of the low-engaged participants were represented by 1 of 3 configurations which described participants’ characteristics as unmotivated high-needers, motivated low-needers, and dissatisfied needers. Robustness tests confirmed the stability of the unmotivated high-needers configuration.

Conclusions:

LIFE4YOUth did not engage high school students with multiple risk behaviors who were content with their lives and did not consider healthy behaviors as very important. However, positive experiences of being both confirmed and encouraged may explain engagement among students engaged in a combination of health-risk and health-promoting behaviors. Future research could explore how adjusting the number of behaviors targeted by mHealth interventions for adolescents might increase engagement and intervention effectiveness.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Seiterö A, Henriksson P, Thomas K, Löf M, Bendtsen M, Müssener U

Adolescents’ Engagement With an mHealth Multiple Health Behavior Change Intervention (LIFE4YOUth): Mixed Methods and Qualitative Comparative Analysis

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e88054

DOI: 10.2196/88054

PMID: 41818749

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.