Currently submitted to: JMIR Aging
Date Submitted: Nov 18, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 2, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Needs and Adoption Determinants of Smart Home Technologies for Aging in Place: Scoping Review
ABSTRACT
Background:
The accelerated aging of the global population, projected to include 1.5 billion people over 60 by 2050, poses significant challenges to conventional eldercare systems. While aging in place is widely advocated for preserving independence, traditional home care models often struggle to meet complex needs. This gap is exacerbated by the diminishing capacity of informal support networks. Smart home technologies offer a viable pathway to augment care; however, their widespread adoption is impeded by a confluence of usability challenges, privacy concerns, and socioeconomic barriers.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to examine how smart home technologies could meet the diverse needs of older adults aging in place, identify the key determinants influencing their adoption and sustained use.
Methods:
This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and reported following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. To ensure comprehensive coverage, a systematic search was performed across eleven databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, APA PsycInfo, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, and OpenGrey) targeting literature published between January 2008 and December 2024. Studies were included if they investigated smart home technologies used by older adults (aged 60 and above) living at home and examined relevant needs and adoption determinants. Study selection and data extraction were guided by the Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework. Thematic analysis was applied to synthesize findings and identify core themes, adoption determinants, and existing gaps in the evidence base.
Results:
A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, with most published after 2015 and primarily conducted in China, the United States, and European countries. The technologies examined ranged from basic sensor-based systems to integrated smart aging platforms. Older adults expressed three core priorities for technology use: health management, safety and emergency support, and support for independent living. Together, these accounted for more than 60 percent of the identified needs. Key facilitators of adoption included strong social support, better digital skills, and a clear perception of usefulness. In contrast, adoption was often limited by challenges such as complex user interfaces, affordability issues, privacy concerns, and cultural resistance. Notably, few studies addressed long-term usage patterns or sustainable implementation models, and the needs of socioeconomically vulnerable groups were insufficiently represented in the current evidence base.
Conclusions:
This review highlighted three primary demands among older adults: health management, safety and emergency support, and the ability to live independently. The adoption of smart aging technologies is influenced by supportive factors such as perceived usefulness and social support, as well as obstacles including usability difficulties, limited digital skills, and privacy concerns. Addressing existing evidence gaps call for a shift from technology-centered approaches to context-aware, user-driven systems grounded in older adults’ everyday experiences. Open Science Framework Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E27KH
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.