Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing
Date Submitted: Nov 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 17, 2025 - Jan 12, 2026
Date Accepted: Mar 1, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
A 24-Hour Time and Motion Study of Acute Nursing Care: Implications for Virtual Nursing Role Development
ABSTRACT
Background:
Understanding current nursing workflows is essential to informing future workforce redesign strategies, including virtual nursing roles. However, granular insights into current nursing workflows over a 24-hour period and across different staff grades, are lacking.
Objective:
1. Quantify how registered and enrolled nurses in the general acute medicine wards distribute their time across direct and indirect care tasks over a 24-hour period 2. Identify multitasking burdens and temporal distributions 3. Identify opportunities for development of a virtual nursing role
Methods:
Using time-and-motion methodology, we observed, registered nurses and enrolled in three general medicine wards over a 24-hour period between April and June 2024. We observed three task categories (Admin, Communication, and Bedside tasks), with multiple individual tasks monitored under each category. Mutli-tasking (i.e. the occurrence of two or more tasks occurring concurrently) was also tracked. The checklist was piloted and refined before data collection.
Results:
We observed a total of 48 nursing shifts. During the daytime, registered nurses spent 70% of their time on indirect care tasks, compared with 54% for enrolled nurses. At night, the proportion of time on indirect care tasks decreased to 58% for registered nurses and 39% for enrolled nurses. During a 24-hour period, a registered nurse spends 326 minutes multitasking (209 mins in the daytime), while an enrolled nurse spends 262 minutes multitasking (152 minutes in the day).
Conclusions:
These findings highlight opportunities for virtual nursing roles, which if thoughtfully designed, may help redistribute indirect care tasks, reduce multitasking burden, and enhance overall efficiency without compromising care quality. Clinical Trial: NA
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.