Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Dec 10, 2025
Date Accepted: May 20, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Sleep–Dependent Memory Assessment in Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study

Tan CCY, Lam A, Ireland D, Bradford D, Cross N, Kurniawan M, Simonetti S, Fripp J, Naismith SL

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Sleep–Dependent Memory Assessment in Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e87926

DOI: 10.2196/87926

PMID: 42275527

Bringing Memory Home: A Pilot Study of Remote Sleep-Dependent Memory Assessment in Older Adults with Cognitive Concerns

  • Clara Cher Yi Tan; 
  • Aaron Lam; 
  • David Ireland; 
  • Dana Bradford; 
  • Nathan Cross; 
  • Melvern Kurniawan; 
  • Simone Simonetti; 
  • Jurgen Fripp; 
  • Sharon L Naismith

ABSTRACT

Background:

Sleep-dependent memory consolidation (SDMC), the process by which sleep supports the transfer of memories into long-term storage, declines with age but remains underexplored in older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Traditional SDMC assessments are typically conducted in lab settings, with limited evidence for feasibility to do these assessments at home for this clinical population.

Objective:

To address this, we co-designed the Sleep Memories app, which assesses overnight memory for a previously validated 32-item word-pair task. This pilot study primarily explored feasibility and acceptability of the app, including willingness to participate. Secondarily, we explored various demographic, clinical, and subjective sleep factors associated with task completion and SDMC performance in a memory clinic sample.

Methods:

Within an 8-month period, we invited 141 older adults aged 50 and above (mean 71.27, SD 7.51) from the Healthy Brain Ageing clinic, a specialist brain health and memory clinic in Sydney, to pilot the Sleep Memories app. All participants underwent a full neuropsychological test battery, medical, and mood assessment.

Results:

The word-pair task completion rate for all trials was over 50%. There was 57% (39/68) completion of both evening and morning delayed recall tests. Lower willingness to participate was associated with lower global cognitive scores, poorer sleep behavior, and clinical factors. Higher task completion was associated with greater education and greater anxiety levels. User feedback indicated that the app was well accepted and liked, although some participants reported minor technical difficulties.

Conclusions:

These findings support the feasibility of mobile app-based SDMC assessment in older adults at risk of cognitive decline and underscore the importance of considering individual characteristics (e.g., subjective sleep factors, clinical characteristics, and education) when designing digital SDMC tools.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tan CCY, Lam A, Ireland D, Bradford D, Cross N, Kurniawan M, Simonetti S, Fripp J, Naismith SL

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Sleep–Dependent Memory Assessment in Older Adults With Cognitive Concerns: Pilot Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e87926

DOI: 10.2196/87926

PMID: 42275527

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.