Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 20, 2025 - Jan 15, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Digital Simulation–Based Ultrasound Training for Physiotherapy Students: A Blinded Randomized Trial Applying Item Response Theory

  • Samuel Fernandez-Carnero; 
  • Belen Diaz-Pulido; 
  • Jorge Méndez-Rodriguez; 
  • Daniel Pecos-Martin; 
  • Santiago Garcia-Miguel; 
  • Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa; 
  • Nicolas Cuenca-Zaldívar; 
  • Fermín Naranjo-Cinto Sr

ABSTRACT

Background:

Background:

Ultrasound education across health sciences has traditionally relied on onsite, instructor-led training. The growing need for scalable, cost-effective, and competency-based education has accelerated the adoption of simulation-based e-learning. WAZO is an online ultrasound simulator designed to reproduce practical scanning experiences through interactive digital training.

Objective:

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of WAZO as an online simulation-based platform for teaching musculoskeletal ultrasound compared with traditional onsite training. Additionally, we used Item Response Theory (IRT) to assess the psychometric properties and discriminative performance of the practical evaluation items.

Methods:

Methods:

A prospective randomized blinded study was conducted with 68 second-year physiotherapy students at the University of Alcalá (Spain). Participants were randomized into two groups: online training using the WAZO platform (experimental) and traditional onsite instruction (control). Both groups completed identical theoretical and practical exams. Rasch modeling under the IRT framework was used to examine item difficulty (δ), student ability (θ), and model fit. Reliability and agreement were analyzed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC).

Results:

Results:

No significant differences were found between online and onsite groups in theoretical or practical performance (P>.05). IRT analysis revealed an adequate unidimensional model fit, identifying “image optimization,” “structure diameter,” and “surface distance” as the most difficult items, and “probe handling” and “structure identification” as the most informative for competency assessment. The model achieved excellent discrimination (area under the curve 0.93) with high sensitivity (87%) and specificity (80%).

Conclusions:

Conclusions:

Simulation-based e-learning using WAZO achieved comparable learning outcomes to traditional ultrasound instruction while offering enhanced scalability, accessibility, and potential cost-effectiveness. The use of Item Response Theory provided deeper psychometric insight into assessment design, supporting its inclusion as a methodological asset in future digital ultrasound education research.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fernandez-Carnero S, Diaz-Pulido B, Méndez-Rodriguez J, Pecos-Martin D, Garcia-Miguel S, Achalandabaso-Ochoa A, Cuenca-Zaldívar N, Naranjo-Cinto F Sr

Digital Simulation–Based Ultrasound Training for Physiotherapy Students: A Blinded Randomized Trial Applying Item Response Theory

JMIR Preprints. 17/11/2025:87897

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.87897

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/87897

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.