Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Nov 13, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 24, 2025 - Jan 19, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

TrainBo: A Pilot Study of Developing an Interactive Robot-assisted Scenario Training System for Older Adults

  • Kwong Chiu Fung; 
  • Wai Ho MOW

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the ability to provide instant feedback and assistance, social robotic systems have been proven effective in enhancing learning experiences across various age groups, ranging from kids to young adults. Robot-assisted training environment may also enhance the learning experience of older adults, compared with traditional instructional environment. However, the strength of interactive robots in promoting learning engagement for older adults has not been well investigated.

Objective:

This study focuses on the design of an interactive robot-assisted scenario training system (TrainBo), derives design requirements and user experience themes through formative research and evaluation.

Methods:

The pilot test was conducted with 11 older adults in an elderly care center in Hong Kong, employing observations and training interviews. It included three phases. Phase 1: Formative research involved face-to-face surveys and semi-structured interviews to identify DRs. Phase 2: Conducted few rounds of iterations based on the identified DRs. Following evidence-based user experience principles and the Self-Determination Theory, we developed TrainBo. We utilised multi-sensory components to improve usability, including automatic speech recognition, visual aids and human-like interactions. Phase 3: We recruited participants in a 4-week training session covering supermarket, restaurant, and transportation scenarios for a evaluation of participants’ engagement and motivation.

Results:

The formative research has identified 5 key Design Requirements (DR): DR1) visual-based instructions, DR2) encouragement and positive feedback, DR3) large and readable fonts, DR4) relatable content, DR5) customizable response time. During the evaluation, participants demonstrated high engagement with TrainBo, with no signs of frustration. They prefer TrainBo to read questions aloud, respond with gestures and provide encouraging responses. We also observed the colour preference, familiarity of equipment usage, the need for visual aids and scenario preference, as well as gaining insights into their communication challenges, levels of patience and engagement.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates the promising role of interactive robot-assisted scenario training systems in enhancing engagement and motivation among older adults. By leveraging the principles of Self-Determination Theory, the system has shown potential in fostering intrinsic motivation and improving user satisfaction. The positive feedback from participants regarding the usability and interactive features of TrainBo suggests that such an interactive robot-assisted scenario training system may be a valuable tool for improving elderly care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Fung KC, MOW WH

TrainBo: A Pilot Study of Developing an Interactive Robot-assisted Scenario Training System for Older Adults

JMIR Preprints. 13/11/2025:87718

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.87718

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/87718

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.