Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 12, 2025 - Jan 7, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The Devil Is In The Details: A Scoping Review of Real-time Psychological Factors Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

  • Kara Mizokami-Stout; 
  • Kira Voelker; 
  • Melissa DeJonckheere; 
  • Lynn Ang; 
  • Evan L. Reynolds; 
  • Joyce M. Lee; 
  • Rodica Pop-Busui; 
  • Brian C. Callaghan; 
  • Emily Hirschfeld; 
  • Jennifer J. Iyengar; 
  • Dana Albright

ABSTRACT

Background:

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a tool that captures emotional states, experiences, and behaviors in real or near-real time. Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data and EMA in unison may be beneficial to understand associations between psychosocial factors and momentary glucose levels. An in-depth understanding of these relationships is crucial for future interventions targeting psychosocial factors in chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus.

Objective:

The goal of this scoping review was to summarize the objectives, methodologies, and outcomes of studies analyzing concurrent psychosocial EMA and CGM data.

Methods:

This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. One-hundred and six studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, and EBSCOhost from May 2009-Jan 2025. Thirteen original research articles that collected and analyzed simultaneous EMA and CGM data were included. Methodological data abstracted included study characteristics, EMA protocols and outcomes, CGM outcomes, and integrated EMA and CGM study objectives.

Results:

Studies primarily recruited adult (92%) populations with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (69%). EMA delivery protocols and outcomes varied significantly and included emotion, self-care behaviors, disordered eating behaviors, interpersonal interactions, cognition, sleep, workload, and impacts of hypoglycemia. Most (69%) studies analyzed blinded CGM data and CGM outcomes included both standardized and non-standardized glucose outcomes. Integrated EMA and CGM data answered study objectives including evaluating impacts of psychosocial and lifestyle factors on momentary glucose metrics; the influence of momentary glucose on emotional states, mood, personal behaviors, sleep, and cognition; and study protocol or mobile application optimization among others.

Conclusions:

The combination of EMA and CGM data provides an opportunity to elucidate the relationship between psychological and behavioral factors with momentary glucose. In this review, we describe a broad range of study characteristics, protocols, outcome measures, and objectives using these novel combined methodologies. Clinical Trial: Not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mizokami-Stout K, Voelker K, DeJonckheere M, Ang L, Reynolds EL, Lee JM, Pop-Busui R, Callaghan BC, Hirschfeld E, Iyengar JJ, Albright D

The Devil Is In The Details: A Scoping Review of Real-time Psychological Factors Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)

JMIR Preprints. 12/11/2025:87688

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.87688

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/87688

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.